Campagna et al v. Language Line Services, Inc.

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON LANGUAGE LINES RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS AND SETTING HEARING re 32 Stipulation. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 32 Stipulation: Simultaneous briefing due by 8/5/2011. Motion Hearing set for 9/2/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/14/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

EJD RSx
CASE NO.: C08-02488 EDJ (PSG)
)
) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
) STIPULATION RE SUPPLEMENTAL
) BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
) LANGUAGE LINE’S RENEWED
) MOTION TO DISMISS RE RECENT
vs.
) DECISION OF THE CALIFORNIA
) SUPREME COURT IN SULLIVAN V.
LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES, INC., a
) ORACLE CORPORATION
Delaware corporation with its principal
)
place of business in the State of California, )
)
Defendants.
)
)
___________________________________

RICHARD V. CAMPAGNA, an individual,
ZONIA FEREAUD, an individual, and
MARTA L. NARANJO, an individual,
On behalf of themselves, those similarly
situated and on behalf of the general public,
Plaintiff,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO.: C08-02488 EJD RSx

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
LANGUAGE LINE’S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS
RE RECENT DECISION OF THE CALIFORNIA
SUPREME COURT IN SULLIVAN V. ORACLE CORP.

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3
4
5

After review of all papers and pleadings filed by the parties herein, and good cause
appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Defendant Language Line’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is deemed

6
7

re-filed, effective July 12, 2011.

8

2. On August 5, 2011, not later than 4:00 p.m., the Parties shall serve

9

simultaneous supplemental briefing of not more than 10 pages in length, limited

10
11
12
13

to a discussion of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Sullivan v. Oracle
Corp. and its application to Language Line’s motion to dismiss, if any.
3. Upon receipt of the supplemental papers, the motion shall be deemed submitted

14
15
16
17

based on the papers previously submitted in support of and in opposition to
Language Line’s motion.
4. The

Court

sets

Language

Line’s

motion

for

oral

argument

on

18
19

September 2
9:00 AM
________________, 2011 at _____.

20
21

July 14
DATED: ___________, 2011

22

HONORABLE EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Court, Northern District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO.: C08-02488 EJD RSx

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
LANGUAGE LINE’S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS
RE RECENT DECISION OF THE CALIFORNIA
SUPREME COURT IN SULLIVAN V. ORACLE CORP.