Litmon v. Kramer
ORDER by Judge Ronald M. Whyte Granting 7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2008)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. NORM KRAMER, Respondent. DAVID LITMON, Petitioner, C 08-2569 RMW (PR) ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
*E-FILED - 12/9/08*
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that Respondent may have until December 10, 2008, to file his answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a traverse with the Court and serving it on Respondent within thirty days of his receipt of the answer. Respondent may, on or before December 10, 2008, file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. If respondent files such a motion, petitioner shall file with the court and serve on respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition within thirty days of receipt of the motion, and respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner a reply withing fifteen days of receipt of any opposition.
12/5 DATED: __________________, 2008.
__________________________________ RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?