Landmark Screens, LLC v. Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius, LLP et al

Filing 110

ORDER FOLLOWING IN CAMERA REVIEW re 85 Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld as Privileged filed by Landmark Screens, LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/3/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

** E-filed February 3, 2010 **

NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION LANDMARK SCREENS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, v. Plaintiff, No. C08-02581 JF (HRL) ORDER FOLLOWING IN CAMERA REVIEW [Re: Docket No. 85]

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

For the Northern District of California

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, a limited liability partnership and THOMAS D. KOHLER, an individual, Defendants. ____________________________________/

This court previously ordered defendant Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP ("MLB") to submit for an in camera review a number of documents that MLB has withheld on privilege grounds but that plaintiff alleges should be disclosed pursuant to the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege. (See Docket No. 108.) Having completed its review of the submitted documents, the court concludes that they reveal no evidence that could support the application of the crime-fraud exception in this case. Accordingly, no further disclosure is necessary at this time. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 3, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

C 08-02581 Notice will be electronically mailed to: Clark S. Stone Courtney Towle Edward John McIntyre Elliot Remsen Peters Inchan Andrew Kwon John Elliot Trinidad Steven Mark Levitan Steven Paul Ragland Wendy Jill Thurm William N. Kammer [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail]

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program.

United States District Court

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

For the Northern District of California

2