Landmark Screens, LLC v. Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius, LLP et al

Filing 176

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND OCTOBER 21, 2010 FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE (approving 174 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 10/25/2010. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
516895.01

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP ELLIOT R. PETERS - #158708 WENDY J. THURM - #163558 STEVEN P. RAGLAND - #221076 JOHN E. TRINIDAD - #250468 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP and THOMAS D. KOHLER CLARK S. STONE - #202123 STEVEN M. LEVITAN - #148716 INCHAN A. KWON - #247614 HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP 2033 Gateway Place, Suite 400 San Jose, CA 95110 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff LANDMARK SCREENS, LLC

**E-Filed 10/25/2010**

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION LANDMARK SCREENS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, a limited liability partnership; and THOMAS D. KOHLER, an individual, Defendants. Case No. 5:08-cv-2581 JF -----------------STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND OCTOBER 21, 2010 FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE Judge: Hon. Jeremy Fogel Courtroom 3

Comp. Filed: May 21, 2008 Trial Date: June 20, 2011

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND OCTOBER 21, 2010 FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE Case No. 5:08-cv-2581 JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
516895.01

This stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff Landmark Screens, LLC and Defendants Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP and Thomas D. Kohler as follows: WHEREAS, on August 13, 2010, Magistrate Judge Lloyd granted in part Morgan Lewis's Motion to Compel Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) Designations and Testimony of Landmark Screens, LLC, and ordered Landmark to designate witnesses for Rule 30(b)(6) Topics 7, 8, 1114, 15-16, 34-35, 45-47 [Docket No. 138]; WHEREAS, on August 27, 2010, Landmark Screens filed a Motion for Relief, challenging Magistrate Judge Lloyd's order as it pertains to Rule 30(b)(6) Topics 7, 8, 11-14 [Docket No. 144]; WHEREAS, the parties have completed briefing on Landmark's Motion for Relief [Docket Nos. 159 (Opposition) and 167 (Reply)]; WHEREAS, Landmark's Motion for Relief is still pending before the court; WHEREAS, on August 27, 2010, the Court entered a Stipulation and Order extending the fact discovery deadline to October 21, 2010 for the purpose of completing the parties' previously noticed depositions, including the remaining Rule 30(b)(6) deposition(s) from Landmark; WHEREAS, the August 27, 2010 Stipulation and Order states that "[s]hould the parties be unable to complete the depositions prior to October 21, 2010, despite best efforts to coordinate scheduling, the fact discovery cut-off shall be further extended as necessary for that limited purpose"; WHEREAS, Landmark will designate the witness or witnesses to testify on the outstanding 30(b)(6) topics after the Court rules on the pending Motion for Relief; WHEREAS, the parties require additional time to complete the remaining Rule 30(b)(6) deposition(s) from Landmark; WHEREAS, the parties agree that extension of the fact discovery deadline for the purpose of completing the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition(s) of Landmark Screens, LLC is warranted; NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, through 2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND OCTOBER 21, 2010 FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE Case No. 5:08-cv-2581 JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
516895.01

their respective counsel of record, that: (1) the fact discovery deadline shall be extended to November 23, 2010 for the purpose of completing the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition(s) of Landmark Screens, LLC; and (2) should the parties be unable to compete these depositions prior to November 23, 2010, despite best efforts to coordinate scheduling, the fact discovery deadline shall be further extended as necessary for this limited purpose.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: October 20, 2010 KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

By: /s/ Wendy J. Thurm WENDY J. THURM Attorneys for Defendants MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP and THOMAS D. KOHLER Dated: October 20, 2010 HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP

By: /s/ Clark S. Stone CLARK S. STONE Attorneys for Plaintiff LANDMARK SCREENS, LLC Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B. regrinding nonfiling signatories, Wendy J. Thurm hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order has been obtained from Clark S. Stone.

3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND OCTOBER 21, 2010 FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE Case No. 5:08-cv-2581 JF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
516895.01

------------------------------------ ORDER [PROPOSED]

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 10/25/2010 Dated: ______________________, _______

HON. JEREMY FOGEL United States District Court Judge

4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND OCTOBER 21, 2010 FACT DISCOVERY DEADLINE Case No. 5:08-cv-2581 JF