Landmark Screens, LLC v. Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius, LLP et al

Filing 45

*** DUPLICATE OF DOCKET # 44 . *** STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (approving docket no. 43 ). The Case Management Conference set for 2/6/2009 is CONTINUED to 2/27/2009 at 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 1/30/09. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2009) Modified on 2/3/2009 (ewn, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP ELLIOT R. PETERS - #158708 WENDY J. THURM - #163558 STEVEN P. RAGLAND - #221076 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 epeters@kvn.com wthurm@kvn.com sragland@kvn.com Attorneys for Defendants MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP and THOMAS D. KOHLER **E-Filed 2/2/09** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION LANDMARK SCREENS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, a limited liability partnership; and THOMAS D. KOHLER, an individual, Defendants. Case No. 5:08-cv-2581 JF STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; -----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER Judge: Honorable Jeremy Fogel Courtroom 3, 5th Floor May 21, 2008 Date Comp. Filed: Trial Date: None set 435084.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 5:08-cv-2581 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, the Parties hereby enter into the following Stipulation to Enlarge Time to File Responsive Pleading to Second Amended Complaint. WHEREAS, on January 20, 2009, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants' motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A), Defendants have until Tuesday, February 3, 2009 to file their Responsive Pleading to the Second Amended Complaint; WHEREAS, Defendants have requested from Plaintiff Landmark Screens, LLC additional time in which to file their Responsive Pleading to the Second Amended Complaint, and Plaintiff Landmark Screens, LLC has agreed to such an extension of time; WHEREAS, Plaintiff Landmark Screens, LLC has requested from Defendants additional time in which to file a Responsive Pleading to Defendants' Responsive Pleading and Defendants have agreed to such an extension of time; WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated to enlarge time to respond to the First Amended Complaint (Docket No. 6); that following reassignment from a Magistrate Judge to this Court, the parties stipulated to a response and briefing cycle for a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (Docket Nos. 13, 14); and that following the grant of Defendants' motion to dismiss and Plaintiff's filing of a Second Amended Complaint, the parties stipulated to a response and briefing cycle for a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 32); WHEREAS, this is the first request to extend time to file a Responsive Pleading following the Court's January 20, 2009 Order. WHEREAS, the proposed time modification does not interfere with any scheduled event in this matter and will not materially affect the schedule for this case; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned, that: 1. The deadline for Defendants to file their Responsive Pleading to the Second Amended Complaint is continued until Tuesday, February 10, 2009. /// /// 2 435084.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 5:08-cv-2581 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. The deadline for Plaintiff to file a Responsive Pleading, if any, to Defendants' Responsive Pleading shall be and is extended by seven (7) days. Dated: January 29, 2009 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP By: /s/ Steven P. Ragland STEVEN P. RAGLAND Attorneys for Defendants MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP and THOMAS D. KOHLER Dated: January 28, 2009 MacPHERSON KWOK CHEN & HEID LLP By: /s/ Clark S. Stone CLARK S. STONE Attorneys for Plaintiff LANDMARK SCREENS, LLC Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order 45, Steven P. Ragland hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Clark S. Stone. ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Case Management Conference set for February 6, 2009 is CONTINUED to February 27, 2009. Dated: 1/30/09 HONORABLE JEREMY FOGEL 3 435084.01 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 5:08-cv-2581 JF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?