Castro v. Customized Performance, Inc. et al

Filing 20

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT; STAND-BY ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 3/4/2009 09:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/3/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION RAFAEL CASTRO, v. Plaintiff, ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT; STAND-BY ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE No. C 08-02616 RS *E-FILED* December 3, 2008 United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CUSTOMIZED PERFORMANCE, INC., et al. Defendants. / TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Court has been informed that the above-entitled action has settled. Accordingly, the Court vacates all pretrial and trial dates. The parties are required to file a stipulation of dismissal by February 25, 2009. If a stipulation of dismissal is not filed by that date, the parties are ordered to appear on March 4, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. and show cause why the case should not be dismissed. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 3, 2008 RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER WAS ELECTRONICALLY PROVIDED TO: James Dal Bon jdblaw@earthlink.net Paul Vincent Simpson psimpson@sgilaw.com, Diana@sgilaw.com, jchan@sgilaw.com, TOdonnell@sgilaw.com Timothy Patrick O'Donnell todonnell@sgilaw.com Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. Dated: December 3, 2008 United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ BAK Chambers of Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?