Levi Strauss & Co v. Chimala Design, Inc.

Filing 14

ORDER APPROVING 13 THIRD STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference set for 12/19/2008 10:30 AM. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/20/08. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP GREGORY S. GILCHRIST (State Bar No. 111536) GIA L. CINCONE (State Bar No. 141668) RAQUEL PACHECO (State Bar No. 245328) Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 576-0200 Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 Email: gsgilchrist@townsend.com; glcincone@townsend.com; rpacheco@townsend.com Attorneys for Plaintiff LEVI STRAUSS & CO. FREDRIC H. AARON 14 Vanderventer Avenue, Suite 212 Port Washington, NY 11050 Telephone: (516) 802-4140 Facsimile: (516) 802-3807 Email: FredAaron@optonline.net Attorney for Defendant CHIMALA DESIGN, INC. **E-Filed 11/20/08** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION LEVI STRAUSS & CO., Plaintiff, v. CHIMALA DESIGN, INC., Defendant. Case No. C 08-02623 JF THIRD STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND -----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER Date: November 21, 2008 Time: 10:30 a.m. Courtroom: 3, 5th Floor Hon. Jeremy Fogel By order dated October 16, 2008, this Court continued the Initial Case Management Conference in this action to November 21, 2008. The parties have now reached an agreement, but additional time is required to finalize the terms. Thus, the parties hereby request that the conference be further continued for an additional four weeks, until December 19, 2008, or as soon as possible THIRD STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV 08-2623 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 thereafter. The parties remain hopeful that a settlement can be finalized in the near future, thus, avoiding any need to expend the parties' or the Court's resources on litigation of this matter. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Initial Case Management Conference currently set for November 21, 2008, be continued to December 19, 2008, in order to give the parties the opportunity to finalize the terms of a settlement. DATED: November 19, 2008 Respectfully submitted, TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP By:_/s/ Raquel Pacheco Raquel Pacheco Attorneys for Plaintiff LEVI STRAUSS & CO. DATED: November 19, 2008 By:_/s/ Fredric H. Aaron_______________ Fredric H. Aaron Attorneys for Defendant CHIMALA DESIGN, INC. THIRD STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV 08-2623 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11/20/08 Dated: __________________, 2008 [PROPOSED] ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, it is hereby ordered that the parties' stipulated request to continue the Initial Case Management Conference is granted. The Initial Case Management Conference is hereby scheduled for December 19, 2008. _____________________________________ The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Court Judge THIRD STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV 08-2623 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 61700446 v1 GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures I, Raquel Pacheco attest that concurrence in the filing of this documents has been obtained from Fredric H. Aaron, counsel for defendant. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 19th day of November, 2008 at San Francisco, California. /s/ Raquel Pacheco Raquel Pacheco THIRD STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. CV 08-2623 JF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?