Farhang v. Indian institute of Technology Kharagpur et al
ORDER re Unserved Defendants and 144 Order to Show Cause. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2010)
Farhang v. Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, KHARAGPUR; TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND TRAINING SOCIETY; PARTHA P. CHAKRABARTI; PALLAB DASGUPTA; GURASHISH S. BRAR; RAKESH GUPTA; PRAVANJAN CHOUDHURY; SUBRAT PANDA; ANIMESH NASKAR, Defendants. MANDANA D. FARHANG and M.A. MOBILE, Plaintiffs, ORDER REGARDING UNSERVED DEFENDANTS No. C-08-02658 RMW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION E-FILED on 7/2/10
On June 2, 2010, the court issued an order to show cause why the unserved defendants in this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Farhang has shown sufficient cause to not have the unserved defendants dismissed at this point, but without prejudice to any newly served defendants bringing a motion to dismiss.
RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge
ORDER REGARDING UNSERVED DEFENDANTS--No. C-08-02658 RMW CCL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?