Farhang v. Indian institute of Technology Kharagpur et al

Filing 177

ORDER by Judge Whyte denying 168 Motion for Discovery. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2010)

Farhang v. Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur et al

Doc. 177

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, KHARAGPUR; TECHNOLOGY ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND TRAINING SOCIETY; PARTHA P. CHAKRABARTI; PALLAB DASGUPTA; GURASHISH S. BRAR; RAKESH GUPTA; PRAVANJAN CHOUDHURY; SUBRAT PANDA; ANIMESH NASKAR, Defendants. MANDANA D. FARHANG and M.A. MOBILE, Plaintiffs, DISCOVERY ORDER No. C-08-02658 RMW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION E-FILED on 7/21/10

[Re Docket No. 168]

Plaintiffs request an order scheduling a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference and allowing discovery to proceed. The court finds that the issues regarding the protective order and the trade secret disclosure list should be addressed prior to commencing further discovery. Plaintiffs are to either obtain a stipulation for a finalized protective order or file a motion with the magistrate judge to finalize a protective order. If defendant Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur ("IIT") feels that the trade secret disclosure list is not sufficiently specific, it must file a motion to compel a more specific trade secret disclosure list with the magistrate judge. The court expects that these
DISCOVERY ORDER--No. C-08-02658 RMW CCL

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

matters will be resolved forthwith. Within ten days after these matters have been resolved, the parties are to meet and confer regarding discovery and to submit either a joint discovery plan or, if the parties are unable to reach agreement, each party's proposed discovery plan. The motion for an order scheduling a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference and allowing discovery to proceed is otherwise denied without prejudice.

DATED:

7/21/10

RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

DISCOVERY ORDER--No. C-08-02658 RMW CCL

2