Goodard v. Google, Inc.

Filing 111

Goodard v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 111 Att. 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

William H. Manning (pro hac vice) E-mail: [e-mail] Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) E-mail: [e-mail] Aaron R. Fahrenkrog (pro hac vice) E-mail: [e-mail] Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. 2800 LaSalle Plaza 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 612-339-4181

Robert T. Haslam (Bar No. 71134) E-mail: [e-mail] Covington & Burling LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-632-4800 Christine Saunders Haskett (Bar No. 188053) E-mail: [e-mail] Samuel F. Ernst (Bar No. 223963) E-mail: [e-mail] Covington & Burling LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415-591-6091 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. CV-08-0986-SI

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al.

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MINNEAPOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants.

Case. No. CV-08-0986-SI STIPULATION REGARDING INFRINGEMENT PROOF FOR U.S. PATENT NO. 6,784,879 [Civil L.R. 7-12]

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies, ULC (collectively "AMD"), and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd.; and Samsung Opto-Electronics America, Inc. (collectively "Samsung") jointly submit this Stipulation regarding the existence of certain claim elements from U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879, asserted by AMD, in consumer products sold by Samsung. The terms
STIPULATION REGARDING INFRINGEMENT PROOF
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

"Television," "Cell Phone," "Camcorder," and "Digital Camera" refer to those products that Samsung has imported, sold, or offered for sale in the United States on or after February 19, 2008. This Stipulation shall apply only to this case, captioned Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., Case No. CV-08-0986-SI. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between AMD and Samsung that: 1. Each Television, Cell Phone, Camcorder, and Digital Camera contains "a processing unit" as recited in claims 11-24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879. 2. Each Television, Cell Phone, Camcorder, and Digital Camera contains "memory that stores programming instructions" as recited in claims 11-16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879. 3. Each Television, Cell Phone, Camcorder, and Digital Camera contains "first," "second," and "third" "storage means for storing programming instructions" as recited in claims 17-24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879. 4. The "processing unit" in each Television, Cell Phone, Camcorder, and Digital Camera provides graphical user interface operations by reading "programming instructions" stored in a "memory" or "storage means," as recited in claims 11-24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879. 5. Each Television, Cell Phone, Camcorder, and Digital Camera contains "programming instructions" that cause the "processing unit" to provide "live video that is being presented as a background on a display" as recited in claims 11-24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879. 6. If the "programming instructions" in each Television, Cell Phone, Camcorder, and Digital Camera cause the "processing unit" to simultaneously provide a "video control icon" and "live video that is being presented on a display," then the "video control icon relates to" that "live video" as recited in claims 11-24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879. 7. Each Television, Cell Phone, Camcorder, and Digital Camera that contains "programming instructions" that cause the "processing unit" to display a "video control icon" also contains "programming instructions" that cause the "processing unit" to "detect selection of the video control icon" as recited in claims 11-24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879.
Case No. CV-08-0986-SI

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MINNEAPOLIS

-2-

STIPULATION REGARDING INFRINGEMENT PROOF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8. If the "programming instructions" in each Television, Cell Phone, Camcorder, and Digital Camera cause the "processing unit" to simultaneously provide a "control panel" and "live video that is being presented as a background on a display," then the "processing unit" provides the "control panel" "while the live video remains in the background," as recited in claims 11-24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879. 9. Each Television, Cell Phone, Camcorder, and Digital Camera that contains "programming instructions" that cause the "processing unit" to display a "control panel" also contains "programming instructions" that cause the "processing unit" to "remove the control panel when another displayed element has been selected" as recited in claims 13, 16, 20, and 24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879. 10. Each Television, Cell Phone, Camcorder, and Digital Camera that contains "programming instructions" that cause the "processing unit" to display a "control panel" also contains "programming instructions" that cause the "processing unit" to "adjust at least one attribute of the live video based on an input received via the control panel" as recited in claims 14-16 and 21-24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879. 11. If the user manual for a Television, Cell Phone, Camcorder, or Digital Camera does not contain screen shots of the user interface for controlling video, that product infringes claims 1124 of U.S. Patent No. 6,784,879.

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

MINNEAPOLIS

DATED: February 25, 2009

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. By:_______________________________________ William H. Manning Aaron R. Fahrenkrog ATTORNEYS FOR ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. AND ATI TECHNOLOGIES, ULC

Case No. CV-08-0986-SI

-3-

STIPULATION REGARDING INFRINGEMENT PROOF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

DATED: February 25, 2009

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By:_______________________________________ Robert T. Haslam Christine Saunders Haskett Samuel F. Ernst ATTORNEYS FOR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC; SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO., LTD.; AND SAMSUNG OPTO-ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. CV-08-0986-SI

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

MINNEAPOLIS

February __, 2009

__________________________________________ Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge

-4-

STIPULATION REGARDING INFRINGEMENT PROOF