Goodard v. Google, Inc.

Filing 128

Goodard v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 128 Att. 15

Exhibit P

Exhibit to the Declaration of Aaron R. Fahrenkrog in Support of Plaintiffs' Opening Claim Construction Brief
Dockets.Justia.com

AMD v. Samsung: '893 claim term

Page 1 of 3

Walling, Sam L.
From: Sent: To: Cc: Haskett, Christine [[e-mail]] Thursday, March 12, 2009 5:01 PM Marder, David E.; Engdahl, Brad P. Walling, Sam L.; Haslam, Robert T; Blankenheimer, Alan H; Siddiqui, Owais A; Sydorak, Kim

Subject: RE: AMD v. Samsung: '893 claim term

David, That's correct. Christine
From: Marder, David E. [mailto:[e-mail]] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 5:01 AM To: Haskett, Christine; Engdahl, Brad P. Cc: Walling, Sam L.; Haslam, Robert T; Blankenheimer, Alan H; Siddiqui, Owais A; Sydorak, Kim Subject: RE: AMD v. Samsung: '893 claim term

>>>> Please read the confidentiality statement below <<<<
Christine: Pursuant to your conversation with Brad from last night, please confirm that you now accept our construction of this claim. Specifically, that "the depth of the first and second impurity regions" is "the depth of the source and drain regions."

From: Haskett, Christine [mailto:[e-mail]] Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 7:57 PM To: Marder, David E.; Engdahl, Brad P. Cc: Walling, Sam L.; Haslam, Robert T; Blankenheimer, Alan H; Siddiqui, Owais A; Sydorak, Kim Subject: RE: AMD v. Samsung: '893 claim term

David, Yes, that is correct. Christine
From: Marder, David E. [mailto:[e-mail]] Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 5:34 AM To: Haskett, Christine; Engdahl, Brad P. Cc: Walling, Sam L.; Haslam, Robert T; Blankenheimer, Alan H; Siddiqui, Owais A; Sydorak, Kim Subject: RE: AMD v. Samsung: '893 claim term

>>>> Please read the confidentiality statement below <<<<
Christine: Please clarify. Does this mean that you no longer assert that the source and drain must have the same depth?

3/16/2009

AMD v. Samsung: '893 claim term

Page 2 of 3

From: Haskett, Christine [mailto:[e-mail]] Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:27 PM To: Engdahl, Brad P.; Marder, David E. Cc: Walling, Sam L.; Haslam, Robert T; Blankenheimer, Alan H; Siddiqui, Owais A; Sydorak, Kim Subject: AMD v. Samsung: '893 claim term

Brad and David, Samsung has decided to drop the following claim term from the '893 patent out of the claim construction process: "the depth of said first and second impurity regions." We propose that the parties jointly notify the court that this term will no longer be part of the Markman process. Please let us know if you agree, and we will draft a short addendum to the Joint Claim Construction Statement to that effect. Christine
Christine Saunders Haskett | COVINGTON One Front Street, San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: [phone] | Fax: [phone] [e-mail] | www.cov.com

& BURLING LLP

This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.

____________________________________________________ Information contained in this e-mail transmission may be privileged, confidential and covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, distribute, or reproduce this transmission. If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please notify us immediately of the error by return email and please delete the message from your system. Pursuant to requirements related to practice before the U. S. Internal Revenue Service, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for purposes of (i) avoiding penalties imposed under the U. S. Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another person any tax-related matter. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. http://www.rkmc.com

3/16/2009