Goodard v. Google, Inc.

Filing 146

Goodard v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 146

1 ROBERT T. HASLAM (Bar No. 71134) 2 MICHAEL K. PLIMACK (Bar No. 133869) 3 CHRISTINE SAUNDERS HASKETT (Bar No. 188053) 4 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 5 San Francisco, CA 94111 6 Facsimile:
Telephone: One Front Street [phone] [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail]

7 ALAN H. BLANKENHEIMER (Bar No. 218713) 8 LAURA E. MUSCHAMP (Bar No. 228717) 9 JO DALE CAROTHERS (Bar No. 228703) 10 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 11 San Diego, CA 92122-1225 12 Facsimile:
Telephone: [phone] [phone] [e-mail] 9191 Towne Centre Drive, 6th Floor [e-mail] [e-mail]

13 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., 15 AMERICA, INC. 16 17 18 19 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al., 20 21 v. 22 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., 23
Defendants and Counterclaimants. Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants,

14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 3:08-CV-0986-SI

SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC, AMERICA, LLC, SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO., LTD., and SAMSUNG OPTO-ELECTRONICS

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,545,592

24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CV-08-0986-SI
Dockets.Justia.com

1

Defendants and Counterclaimants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor,

2 Inc., Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung 3 4 5 6

Telecommunications America, LLC, Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd., and Samsung Opto-Electronics America, Inc. ("Samsung") have moved the Court for summary judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 5,545,592 ("the '592 patent") under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and

7 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and/or 103. 8
Having considered that motion and its supporting papers, any oppositions to that motion,

9 and any further proceedings, and finding good cause supporting it, the Court finds that: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

U.S. Patent No. 5,975,912 ("the Hillman patent") is prior art to the '592 patent under at least 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) because the Hillman patent was filed before the conception of the '592 patent; every limitation of claims 1 and 4 of the '592 patent is disclosed by U.S. Patent No. 5,975,912 ("the Hillman patent"), and in particular, at least by the Hillman patent at 1:11-21 and 15:29-37; claims 1 and 4 of the '592 patent are anticipated by the Hillman patent. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Samsung's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 5,545,592 is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: _______________

____________________________________ Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge

CV-08-0986-SI