Goodard v. Google, Inc.

Filing 26

MEMORANDUM in Opposition (FILED UNDER SEAL) (gm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2008) .

Goodard v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 26

Case5:08-cv-02738-JF Document23

Filed09/04/08 Page1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

John P. Bovich (SBN 150688) E-mail: [e-mail] Reed Smith LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415-391-8269 William H. Manning (pro hac vice) E-mail: [e-mail] Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. 2800 LaSalle Plaza 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapo lis, MN 55402 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 612-339-4181 Attorneys for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al.

Robert T. Haslam E-mail: [e-mail] Michael K. Plimack E-mail:[e-mail] Heller Ehrman LLP 275 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, CA 94026-3506 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 650-324-0638 Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.

ROBINS , K APLAN , M ILLER & C IRESI L.L.P.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

A TTORNEYS AT LAW

M INNEAPOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al., Plaint iffs, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al, Defendants. No. CV-08-0986-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS [Civil L.R. 16-8, ADR L.R. 3-5]

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

Case No. CV-08-0986-SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Dockets.Justia.com

Case5:08-cv-02738-JF Document23

Filed09/04/08 Page2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

The parties stipulate to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: __ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) __ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) __ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

Private Process: X Private ADR (please identify process and provider): The parties have selected mediation to be agreed upon by the parties.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ____ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) _X _ other requested deadline: _at a time to be agreed upon by the parties with the

approval of the Court.

Dated: May 9, 2008.

/s/ William H. Manning William H. Manning Attorney for Plaintiffs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies, ULC

Dated: May 9, 2008.

/s/ Robert T. Haslam Robert T. Haslam Attorney for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; Samsung Techwin Co.; and Samsung Opto-Electronics America, Inc. Plaintiffs' counsel attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained by the above-named signatory

Case No. CV-08-0986-SI

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Case5:08-cv-02738-JF Document23

Filed09/04/08 Page3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. CV-08-0986-SI

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: ___ ___ ___ X Non-binding Arbitration Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) Mediation Private ADR

Deadline for ADR session ___ X 90 days from the date of this order other: __at a time to be agreed upon by the parties with the approval of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: Susan Illston United States District Judge

-3-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS