Goodard v. Google, Inc.

Filing 99

Download PDF
Goodard v. Google, Inc. Doc. 99 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 William H. Manning (pro hac vice) E-mail: WHManning@rkmc.com Brad P. Engdahl (pro hac vice) E-mail: BPEngdahl@rkmc.com Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P. 2800 LaSalle Plaza 800 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: 612-349-8500 Facsimile: 612-339-4181 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., et al. Robert T. Haslam (Bar No. 71134) E-mail: Rhaslam@cov.com Covington & Burling L.L.P. 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: 650-632-4700 Facsimile: 650-632-4800 Christine Saunders Haskett (Bar No. 188053) E-mail: Chaskett@cov.com Covington & Burling L.L.P. One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-591-7087 Facsimile: 415-955-6587 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MINNEAPOLIS ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. Case. No. CV-08-0986-SI STIPULATION REGARDING PAGE LIMITS FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING [Civil L.R. 7-12] Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ATI Technologies ULC (collectively "AMD"), and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLP; Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd.; and Samsung Opto-Electronics America, Inc. (collectively "Samsung") jointly submit this Stipulation regarding page limits for claim construction briefing. WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), each party claiming patent infringement is allotted 25 pages for its opening brief in support of its constructions of terms from its asserted patents. Case. No. CV-08-0986-SI STIPULATION REGARDING PAGE LIMITS FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), each party is allotted 25 pages for its responsive brief in support of its constructions of terms from the other party's asserted patents. WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), each party is allotted 15 pages for its reply brief in support of its constructions of terms from its asserted patents. WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), the total pages of claim construction briefing would not exceed 130 pages. WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and reached agreement that 15 terms from AMD's asserted patents are currently in dispute and 4 terms from Samsung's asserted patents are currently in dispute (Dkt. #92). WHEREAS, the parties wish to enter a joint stipulation adjusting the page limits for claim construction briefing to reflect the number of terms that will be discussed in each brief. Now, therefore, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between AMD and Samsung, that: 1. With the Court's approval, the parties shall adjust the page limits for claim construction briefing in accordance with the following table, which results in a maximum of 140 pages (10 additional pages). The adjustment adds 10 pages to AMD's opening brief addressing the 15 terms from AMD's patents and adds 10 pages to Samsung's responsive brief addressing the 15 terms from AMD's patents. The adjustment subtracts 5 pages from Samsung's opening brief addressing the 4 terms from Samsung's patents and subtracts 5 pages from AMD's responsive brief addressing the 4 terms from Samsung's patents: Terms from AMD's Patents Opening Brief Responsive Brief Reply Brief TOTAL 35 Pages 35 Pages 15 Pages 85 Pages Terms from Samsung's patents 20 Pages 20 Pages 15 Pages 55 Pages ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW MINNEAPOLIS Case No. CV-08-0986-SI -2- STIPULATION REGARDING PAGE LIMITS FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DATED: January 23, 2009 ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. By:_/s/ William H. Manning ___________________ William H. Manning Brad P. Engdahl ATTORNEYS FOR ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. AND ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC DATED: January 23, 2009 COVINGTON & BURLING L.L.P. By:_/s/ Christine S. Haskett____________________ Robert T. Haslam Christine Saunders Haskett ATTORNEYS FOR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC; SAMSUNG TECHWIN CO., LTD.; AND SAMSUNG OPTO-ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. Plaintiffs' counsel attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above-named signatory. ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. CV-08-0986-SI ATTORNEYS AT LAW MINNEAPOLIS PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. January __, 2009 ____________________________ Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge -3- STIPULATION REGARDING PAGE LIMITS FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?