Verizon California Inc. et al v. OnLineNic Inc

Filing 165

ORDER FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTIONS TO STAY/APPOINT RECEIVER (approving 163 ). Motion Hearing set for 9/25/2009 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 9/14/2009. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2009)

Download PDF
**E-Filed 9/14/2009** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1. Defendant's Motion to Stay Pending Appeal, and Plaintiffs' Motion to Appoint a Receiver shall be heard at 9:00 AM, September 25, 2009, at Courtroom 3, 5th Fllor. San Jose, CA.; 2. 3. Defendant shall file its moving papers no later than September 11, 2009; Plaintiffs shall file their opposition and cross-motion on appointment of a receiver IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: v s. ONLINENIC INC.; and DOES 1-10, Defendants. Hon. Jeremy Fogel VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC.; VERIZON TRADEMARK SERVICES LLC; and VERIZON LICENSING COMPANY, Plaintiffs, Case No. CV-08-2832-JF [PROPO -ED] ------------S----- ORDER FOR BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTIONS TO STAY/APPOINT RECEIVER Date: September 25, 2009 Time: 9:00 am Ctrm: 3, 5th Fl. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION no later than noon, September 21, 2009; 4. Defendant shall file any reply no later than 3pm, September 23, 2009, and [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTIONS TO STAY /APPOINT RECEIVER VERIZON V. ONLINENIC, CASE NO. 08-2832. PAGE 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 5. its entry. Any order appointing a receiver shall be automatically stayed for 10 days following IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September __1___, 2009 _4 JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTIONS TO STAY /APPOINT RECEIVER VERIZON V. ONLINENIC, CASE NO. 08-2832. PAGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?