Landon v. Ernst & Young LLP et al

Filing 107

Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte denying 106 Stipulation (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 E-FILED on 3/20/13 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 JOSEPH LANDON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, No. C-08-02853 RMW 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 ERNST & YOUNG LLP, a limited liability partnership; ERNST & YOUNG U.S. LLP, a limited liability partnership; and DOES 1-100 inclusive, 18 ORDER REJECTING STIPULATION TO ADJUST TRIAL DATE & REMAINING PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES [Re Docket No. 106] Defendants. 19 20 Both parties stipulate and request an order extending the trial date and remaining pre-trial 21 dates by approximately four months. The court does not accept the parties stipulation absent a 22 declaration(s) explaining (1) why the discovery could not have been completed within the schedule 23 ordered by the court and (2) why another trial was scheduled for the same day for Landon's counsel. 24 Thus, the court rejects the parties' stipulation with leave to refile. 25 26 27 DATED: March 20, 2013 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 28 ORDER REJECTING STIPULATION TO ADJUST TRIAL DATE & REMAINING PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES—No. C-08-02853 RMW LJP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?