Pebble Beach Company v. Callahan

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (approving docket no. 33 ). Signed by Judge Jeremy Fogel on 11/14/08. (jflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NEIL L. SHAPIRO (SBN 051547) LAW OFFICES OF NEIL L. SHAPIRO 2100 Garden Road, Suite C Monterey, California 93940 Telephone: (831) 372-3700 Facsimile: (831) 372-3701 nshapiro@nshapiro.com Attorneys for Plaintiff PEBBLE BEACH COMPANY **E-Filed 11/14/08** UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION PEBBLE BEACH COMPANY, a California General Partnership, Plaintiff, vs. GLENN R. CALLAHAN, an Individual, Defendant. Case No. C 08-02920 JF STIPULATION AND -----------------[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff Pebble Beach Company through its counsel of record and Defendant Glenn R. Callahan, in propria persona, that the abovecaptioned matter shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear his or its own attorney's fees and costs. Dated: November 4, 2008 NEIL L. SHAPIRO LAW OFFICES OF NEIL L. SHAPIRO By _____ /s/ __________________________ Attorneys for Plaintiff PEBBLE BEACH COMPANY STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. C 08-02920 JF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 8, 2008 GLENN R. CALLAHAN By _____ /s/ __________________________ Glenn R. Callahan, Defendant Upon the Stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: November __, 2008 __________________________________ United States District Judge 2 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Case No. C 08-02920 JF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?