Cryotech International, Inc. v. Technifab Products, Inc.

Filing 146

ORDER GRANTING 145 REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE filed by Technifab Products, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/7/2010. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ** E-filed January 7, 2010 ** NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CRYOTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware Corporation, fka VBS INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, v. Plaintiff, No. C08-02921 HRL ORDER GRANTING TECHNIFAB'S REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE [Re: Docket No. 145] United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California TECHNIFAB PRODUCTS, INC., an Indiana Corporation; and DOES 150 inclusive, Defendant. ____________________________________/ Having considered Technifab's counsel's request to allow co-counsel Arthur J. Casey to appear by telephone at the status conference set for January 19, 2010 at 1:30 p.m., and good cause appearing, the court grants the request. Mr. Casey shall initiate the call to the court via CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 just prior to the time appointed for the conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 7, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 C 08-02921 HRL Notice will be electronically mailed to: Arthur J. Casey David Richard Johanson Douglas Andrew Rubel Mark Douglas Hassler ajc@robinsonwood.com, kkn@robinsonwood.com drj@esop-law.com, msshelli@esop-law.com dar@johansonberenson.com, msshelli@esop-law.com hassler@huntlawfirm.net Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the Northern District of California 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?