Rotroff v. Mayberg

Filing 10

ORDER Requuiring Respondent to File Additional Exhibits. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/14/10. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Requiring Respondent to File Additional Exhibits P:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\HC.08\Rotroff971exh.wpd *E-FILED - 4/14/10* IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DENIS K. ROTROFF, Petitioner, vs. STEPHEN MAYBERG, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 08-2971 RMW (PR) ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO FILE ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS Petitioner, a civil detainee at Coalinga State Hospital under California's "Sexually Violent Predators Act" (California Welfare & Institutions Code § 6600 et. seq.) ("SVPA"), filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Following an initial review of the petition, the court found petitioner's claims cognizable and ordered respondent to show cause why the petition should not be granted. Respondent filed an answer denying the merits of the petition, along with a supporting memorandum and exhibits. The court requires supplemental materials to aid its review of petitioner's claims. Accordingly, within twenty-one (21) days of the date this order is filed, respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner a copy of petitioner's 1979 plea agreement and a copy of the transcript of petitioner's July 5, 1979 plea colloquy. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4/14/10 DATED: _______________ RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?