Nava v. Seadler et al

Filing 102

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 99 Continuing Hearing and Briefing for Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 12/22/10. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 12/23/2010)

Nava v. Seadler et al

Doc. 102

1 Anthony Boskovich, No. 121198 Boskovich & Appleton 2 28 N. First Street, 6th Floor San Jose, California 95113-1210 3 4 [phone] [e-mail] 5 6 Attorney for plaintiff NANCY NAVA Law Offices of Anthony Boskovich 28 North First Street, 6th Floor, San Jose, CA 95113 [phone] 7 8 9 10 11 12 NANCY NAVA, 13 v. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 08 03066 PSG STIPULATION AND [XXXOPXXSXXX ] ORDER PRXXXO XED CONTINUING HEARING AND BRIEFING FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

14 MIKE SEADLER, individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; CLYDE CHENG, 15 individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; ALEX TORKE, individually and in 16 his capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; A. WOLF, individually and in his capacity as a Santa 17 Clara police officer; S. MAJOROS, individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; 18 T. SHEARER, individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; J. FANUCCHI, 19 individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; T. NIESEN, individually and in his 20 capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; M. OVER, individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara 21 police officer; DAN WINTER, individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara police sergeant; A. 22 LANGE, individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; R. CIRAULO, 23 individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; J. MASTILOCK, individually and 24 in his capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; A. LAYTON, individually and in his capacity as a 25 Santa Clara police officer; J. GREEN, individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; 26 D. RUSH, individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; F. SAUNDERS, 27 individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara

28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Motion for Summary Judgment

Page 1

Dockets.Justia.com

Law Offices of Anthony Boskovich 28 North First Street, 6th Floor, San Jose, CA 95113 [phone]

1 police officer; D. MACHADO, individually and ) in his capacity as a Santa Clara police officer; ) 2 J. OLIVER, individually and in his capacity as a ) Santa Clara police officer; B. STERKEL, ) 3 individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara ) police officer; MARK SCHALLER, ) 4 individually and in his capacity as a Santa Clara ) police officer; JOHN DOE and RICHARD ROE, ) 5 individually and in their capacities as Santa Clara ) police officers, the true names and exact numbers ) 6 of whom are unknown at this time; CITY OF ) SANTA CLARA, a municipal corporation, ) 7 Defendants. ) __________________________________________) 8 9 Pursuant to Northern District of California Rule 7-7, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by

10 and between the parties hereto, through their respective attorneys of record, that the hearing on the 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants in this matter, which is currently set for hearing 12 on 11 January 2011 at 10:00 A.M. before the Honorable Paul Grewal be continued 3 weeks to 1 13 February 2011 before the Honorable Paul Grewal in Courtroom 5. The purpose of this stipulation 14 is to allow plaintiff time to prepare his opposition to the motion after the holidays. With the 15 exception of expert discovery, all discovery is complete and this case ready to be set for trial at the 16 case management conference set for 11 January 2011 at the court's earliest convenience. 17 Plaintiff's opposition shall be due 21 days prior to the hearing, and defendants' reply, if any,

18 shall be due 14 days prior to the hearing. 19 20 Dated: 17 December 2010 21 22 23 24 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Motion for Summary Judgment
Page 2

/s/ Anthony Boskovich ____________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff

1 Dated: 17 December 2010 2 3 4 5 6 Law Offices of Anthony Boskovich 28 North First Street, 6th Floor, San Jose, CA 95113 [phone] 7 8 Pursuant to the above stipulation, it is hereby ordered that the hearing on defendants' motion ORDER /s/ Jon Heaberlin ______________________ Attorney for Defendants

9 for summary judgment is continued to 1 February 2011 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom 5. Plaintiff 10 shall file any opposition 21 days in advance of that date, and defendants shall file any reply 14 days 11 in advance of that date. 12
X December 22, 13 Dated: ___________ 2011 0

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Motion for Summary Judgment XXXXXXX
Page 3

_________________________________________ Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court