Nava v. Seadler et al

Filing 145

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 144 Stipulation filed by City of Santa Clara. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on August 18, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

JON A. HEABERLIN (SBN 199810)
RANKIN, LANDSNESS, LAHDE,
SERVERIAN & STOCK
96 No. Third Street, Suite 500
San Jose, California 95112-7709
[phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
MIKE SEADLER, ALEX TORKE,
ALAN WOLF, STEVEN MAJOROS, TYSON SHEARER,
TRAVIS NIESEN, MARTIN OVER,
DAN WINTER, DEREK RUSH, CITY OF SANTA CLARA,
and MARK SCHALLER

8
9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12

NANCY NAVA,

13

Plaintiff,

14

vs.

15

MIKE SEADLER, individually and in
his capacity as a Santa Clara police
officer; CLYDE CHENG, individually
and in his capacity as a Santa Clara
police officer, ALEX TORKE,
individually and in his capacity as a
Santa Clara police officer; A. WOLF,
individually and in his capacity as a
Santa Clara police officer; S.
MAJOROS, individually and in his
capacity as a Santa Clara police
officer; T. SHEARER, individually
and in his capacity as a Santa Clara
police officer; J. FANUCCHI,
individually and in his capacity as a
Santa Clara police officer; T.
NIESEN, individually and in his
capacity as a Santa Clara police
officer; M. OVER, individually and in
his capacity as a Santa Clara police
officer; DAN WINTER, individually
and in his capacity as a Santa Clara
police officer; A. LANGE, individually
and in his capacity as a Santa Clara
police officer; R. CIRAULO,
individually and in his capacity as a
Santa Clara police officer; J.
MASTILOCK, individually and in his
capacity as a Santa Clara police

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. C 08-3066 PSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING THE ENTRY INTO AND USE
OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE
COURTROOM
Trial Date: August 22, 2011
Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ENTRY INTO AND USE OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN COURTROOM - Case
No. 08-03066 PSG

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

officer; A. LAYTON, individually and
in his capacity as a Santa Clara
police officer; J. GREEN, individually
and in his capacity as a Santa Clara
police officer; D. RUSH, individually
and in his capacity as a Santa Clara
police officer; F. SAUNDERS,
individually and in his capacity as a
Santa Clara police officer; D.
MACHADO, individually and in his
capacity as a Santa Clara police
officer; J. OLIVER, individually and in
his capacity as a Santa Clara police
officer; B. STERKEL, individually and
in his capacity as a Santa Clara
police officer; JOHN DOE and
RICHARD ROE, individually and in
their capacities as Santa Clara police
officers, the true names and exact
numbers of whom are unknown at
this time; CITY OF SANTA CLARA,
a municipal corporation,

12
Defendants.
13
_____________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

14
15

The parties hereby submit to the Court a list of the electronic equipment to be used

16

during trial and request the Court enter an Order permitting the following electronic and

17

audio-visual equipment to be used to provide for the display of depositions,

18

demonstratives, exhibits and graphics - all of which will aid the Court and Jury in reviewing

19

the presentations and evidence submitted during trial:

20

1)

One Canon Video Visualizer (Commonly referred to as an “Elmo”);

21

2)

One LCD Projector;

22

3)

Three Laptop computers;

23

4)

Two External Hard Drives;

24

5)

Two Small Tables;

25

6)

Two tri-pods;

26

7)

Two platen tops for tri-pods;

27

8)

A set of portable stereo speakers;

28

9)

Large tripod projection screen; and
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ENTRY INTO AND USE OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN COURTROOM - Case
No. 08-03066 PSG

1

10)

2

for cable safety.

3
4
5

A large bag with various cables, power cords, power strips, and other items

The above listed equipment will be brought into the courtroom and operated by
Andrew Lloyd, of Litigation Media Group, LLC, and its designated agents.
The Court has inherent power to manage the proceedings for it and its courtrooms.

6

See United States v. Grace, 526 F.3d 499, 509 (9th Cir. 2008) (“Judges exercise

7

substantial discretion over what happens inside the courtroom. [Citations] We have

8

accepted that ‘[a]ll federal courts are vested with inherent powers enabling them to

9

manage their cases and courtrooms effectively...’ [Citations].”)

10

The parties are working together to coordinate the shared use of the equipment

11

(excluding the laptops). The parties jointly request that the Court grant this Application

12

and enter an order permitting Andrew Lloyd of Litigation Media Group, LLC, and its

13

designated agents, to bring and use the above listed equipment into the Courtroom on

14

August 19, 2011.
LAW OFFICES OF ANTHONY
BOSKOVICH

15
16
DATED:/s/ August 17, 2011

/s/ Anthony Boskovich
ANTHONY BOSKOVICH
Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: August 17, 2011

17

RANKIN, LANDSNESS, LAHDE,
SERVERIAN & STOCK

18
19
20
21

By: /s/ Jon A. Heaberlin
JON A. HEABERLIN
Attorney for Defendants

22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
DATED: August 18, 2011
27

MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ENTRY INTO AND USE OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN COURTROOM - Case
No. 08-03066 PSG