Sou v. United States of America

Filing 13

ORDER Denying Motion for Reconsideration and Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/3/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 *E-FILED - 1/3/13* 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 NO. C-08-3072-RMW Related Criminal Case: CR-03-20110-RMW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Respondent, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v. THIN EDWARD SOU, 15 Defendant/Movant. 16 17 Thin Edward Sou moves pro se for reconsideration or for leave to file a motion for 18 reconsideration of the court's denial of his motion attacking his sentence. Although petitioner was 19 represented at the hearing on his ยง 2255 motion, he has filed the current motion pro se. His apparent 20 reason for filing pro se is that he wanted to insure timeliness of the motion. The court has 21 considered the motion for reconsideration or leave to file a motion for reconsideration and hereby 22 denies the motion. 23 24 Dated: 1/3/13 25 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION NO. C-08-03072, CR-03-20110-RMW 1 1 Copy of Order Mailed Electronically to: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 John N. Glang, AUSA Office of the United States Attorney 150 Almaden Blvd, Suite 900 San Jose, CA 95113 Email: John.Glang@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America Eric Russell Krebs Law Offices of Eric R. Krebs 44 Montgomery Street Suite 3585 San Francisco, CA 94104 Email: erkrebs@yahoo.com Attorney for Defendant 11 Copy of Order Mailed on 1/3/13 to: 12 Thin Edward Sou F.C.I. Elkton P.O. Box 10 Lisbon, OH 44432 Movant/Defendant 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION NO. C-08-03072, CR-03-20110-RMW 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?