Valadez et al v. Aguallo et al

Filing 99

JUDGMENT. The Clerk shall close this file Signed by Judge James Ware on October 2, 2009. (jwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2009) Modified on docket text 10/3/2009 (ecg, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Jose Valadez, et al., v. Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 08-03100 JW JUDGMENT United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Ruben Aguallo, et al., Defendants. / This case was tried to a jury, District Judge James Ware presiding. Attorney Blaine Fields represented Plaintiffs Jose Valadez and Babita Valadez. Attorney Dov Grunschlag represented Defendants Ruben Aguallo and Paul Gregorio. The case was submitted to the jury for decision on four claims, as follows: The First Claim was by Plaintiffs against both Defendants for violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(c)(d). The Second Claim was by Plaintiffs against both Defendants for common law extortion. The Third Claim was by Plaintiffs against both Defendants for fraud. The Fourth Claim was by Plaintiffs against both Defendants for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The verdict form required the Jury to state its finding with respect to each claim by answering written interrogatories. On September 21, 2009, the jury returned a unanimous verdict on each interrogatory submitted to it. (See Docket Item No. 97.) Pursuant to the jury verdict, judgment is entered as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 On Plaintiffs' First, Second, and Fourth Claim: (1) Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Jose Valadez in the amount of $70,001. This amount represents $1 of damages for injury to business, $60,000 of compensatory damages, and $10,000 of punitive damages for Plaintiff Jose Valadez. Of the compensatory damages, $35,000 shall be paid by Defendant Ruben Aguallo and $25,000 shall be paid by Defendant Paul Gregorio. Of the punitive damages, $5000 shall be paid by each Defendant. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Babita Valadez in the amount of $70,001. This amount represents $1 of damages for injury to business, $60,000 of compensatory damages, and $10,000 of punitive damages for Plaintiff Babita Valadez. Of the compensatory damages, $35,000 shall be paid by Defendant Ruben Aguallo and $25,000 shall be paid by Defendant Paul Gregorio. Of the punitive damages, $5000 shall be paid by each Defendant. (3) In total, Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs Jose Valadez and Babita Valadez in the amount of $140,002. This amount represents $2 of damages for injury to business, $120,000 of compensatory damages, and $20,000 of punitive damages for both Plaintiffs. Of this total, $80,001 shall be paid by Defendant Ruben Aguallo and $60,001 shall be paid by Defendant Paul Gregorio. On Plaintiffs' Third Claim, judgment is entered in favor of both Defendants. Plaintiffs Jose Valadez and Babita Valadez shall take nothing from these Defendants on the Third Claim. Plaintiffs are entitled to an award of attorney fees and costs against both Defendants pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c). The Clerk shall close this file. United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 2, 2009 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Blaine L. Fields blaine.fields@sbcglobal.net Dov M. Grunschlag dgrunschlag@carterfries.com Michelle Q. Carter michelle@carterfries.com William P. Donovan william.donovan@dlapiper.com Dated: October 2, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?