Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al

Filing 107

Proposed Order re 105 MOTION Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion For Continuance of the Briefing and Hearing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay and Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike by IAC Search & Media, Inc., Lycos Inc.. (Kash, Jennifer) (Filed on 4/29/2009)

Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al

Doc. 107

1 Claude M. Stern (CA Bar No. 96737) Jennifer A. Kash (CA Bar No. 203679) 2 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 3 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 4 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 5 Email: [e-mail] Email:[e-mail] 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. CV 08-03172-RMW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER OR STAY AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE

11 GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., and 12 LYCOS, INC., 13 14 v. Plaintiffs,

15 L. DANIEL EGGER, SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, and 16 SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF CASE NO. C-08-03172-RMW

Defendants.

Dockets.Justia.com

1

Having considered Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion for Continuance of the Briefing and

2 Hearing Schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay and Plaintiffs' Motion to 3 Strike, the opposition thereto by Defendants L. Daniel Egger, Software Rights Archive, LLC and 4 Site Technologies, Inc., and all supporting papers, 5 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion is GRANTED. The Court hereby enters the following briefing and hearing schedule for Defendants'

7 Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay Under the First-To-File Rule, Under Rule 12(b)(2) For Lack 8 of Personal Jurisdiction, and Under Rule 12(b)(1) For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Dkt. 9 No. 42) (hereinafter "Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay") and Plaintiffs' Motion to 10 Strike Site Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay (Dkt. No. 64) (hereinafter 11 "Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike"): 12 Event 13 Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion 14 to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay 15 Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike 16 17 18 Defendants' Reply in Support of Their 19 Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay 20 Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Their Motion to Strike 21 Hearing on (i) Defendants' Motion to 22 Dismiss, Transfer or Stay; and (ii) Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike 23 24 25 26 27 28
51429/2906046.4

Old Deadline May 1, 2009

New Deadline 30 days after the entry of an Order granting Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion to Compel or 5 business days after the entry of an Order denying Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion to Compel 7 days after the filing of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay 60 days after the entry of an Order granting Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion to Compel, or on the earliest date thereafter that is convenient for the Court 30 days after the entry of an Order denying Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion to Compel, or on the earliest date thereafter that is convenient for the Court

May 8, 2009

May 22, 2009

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF CASE NO. C-08-03172-RMW

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
51429/2906046.4

SO ORDERED this ______ day of _______________, 2009.

_____________________________________ THE HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF CASE NO. C-08-03172-RMW

2