Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al
Filing
111
Proposed Order re 110 Reply to Opposition, by L. Daniel Egger, Software Rights Archive LLC. (Kaplan, Lee) (Filed on 4/30/2009)
Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al
Doc. 111
1 lkaplan@skv.com
Lee L. Kaplan (Texas Bar No. 11094400) Kristen L. McKeever (Texas Bar No. 24030775) Raj Duvvuri (Texas Bar No. 24054185) (admitted pro hac vice)
2 kmckeever@skv.com 3 rduvvuri@skv.com
4 Smyser Kaplan & Veselka, L.L.P. 5 Houston, TX 77002 7 8 9 10 11 12 GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, YAHOO! 13 14 15 v. 16 L. DANIEL EGGER, SOFTWARE 17 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[Proposed] Order Denying Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion for Continuance of the Briefing Schedule and Hearing on the Motions Set for May 22, 2009 CASE NO. CV08-03172
700 Louisiana Street, Suite 2300 Telephone: (713) 221-2300
6 Facsimile: (713) 221-2320
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., and LYCOS, INC. Plaintiffs
Case No. CV08-03172RMW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING ON THE MOTIONS SET FOR MAY 22, 2009
RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, and SITE Defendants
1
Dockets.Justia.com
1
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion for Continuance of the
2 Briefing Schedule and Hearing on the Motions Set for May 22, 2009. Having considered the 3 motion, response, pleadings, evidence, and argument of counsel, the Court finds and holds that 4 the Motion should be DENIED. It is therefore 5 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[Proposed] Order Denying Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion for Continuance of the Briefing Schedule and Hearing on the Motions Set for May 22, 2009 CASE NO. CV08-03172
ORDERED that the Hearing on the Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay remain set for
6 Oral argument on May 22, 2009.
Dated: , 2009. ____________________________________ Hon. Ronald Whyte UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?