Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al

Filing 117

STIPULATION re 42 MOTION to Dismiss, 64 MOTION to Strike 42 MOTION to Dismiss , Transfer or Stay FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Yahoo! Inc.. (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 6/29/2009)

Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al

Doc. 117

Case5:08-cv-03172-RMW Document117

Filed06/29/09 Page1 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

[SEE SIGNATURE PAGE FOR COUNSEL]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., and LYCOS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. L. DANIEL EGGER, SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, and SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants.

Case No.

C-08-03172-RMW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY

Date: July 31, 2009 Time: 9:00 AM Courtroom: 6, 4th Floor Judge: Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE - Case No. C-08-03172-RMW sf-2706426
Dockets.Justia.com

Case5:08-cv-03172-RMW Document117

Filed06/29/09 Page2 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay Under the First-To-File Rule, Under Rule 12(b)(2) For Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, and Under Rule 12(b)(1) For Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Dkt. No. 42) (hereinafter "Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay") and Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Site Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay (Dkt. No. 64) are currently set to be heard on July 31, 2009 at 9:00 am; WHEREAS Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay, and Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike are currently due July 2, 2009, with the parties' respective reply briefs in support of their motions due July 17, 2009; WHEREAS the parties wish to continue the deadlines for their opposition papers from July 2, 2009 to July 8, 2009 in order to complete certain discovery in connection with these motions; WHEREAS Plaintiffs believe that eight additional pages are necessary for them to fully brief the many issues presented by Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay, and Defendants do not object to the additional page allowance. The parties also agree that Defendants should receive a reciprocal allowance of eight additional pages for their reply brief in support of their Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay, if needed;1 WHEREAS allowing the parties to submit the additional pages will not unduly burden the parties or the Court; THEREFORE THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay, and Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike will be due July 8, 2009, rather than July 2, 2009. Both parties' reply papers in support of their respective motions will remain due July 17, 2009. Plaintiffs may file a brief in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay that contains eight additional pages of text in excess of the page limit set forth in Civil Local On April 30, 2009, the parties filed a stipulation and proposed order (Dkt. No. 109) requesting leave for Plaintiffs to submit eight additional pages of briefing for Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay and eight additional pages of briefing for Defendants' Reply brief in support. The order has not yet been entered, however.
1

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE - Case No. C-08-03172-RMW sf-2706426

1

Case5:08-cv-03172-RMW Document117

Filed06/29/09 Page3 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Rule 7-4. Defendants may likewise file a reply brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay containing eight additional pages of text in excess of the page limit set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-4.

Dated: June 29, 2009

Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Thomas B. Walsh, IV Thomas B. Walsh, IV (admitted pro hac vice) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 5000 Bank One Center 1717 Main Street Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Juanita R. Brooks (SBN 75934, [e-mail]) Jason W. Wolff (SBN 215819, [e-mail]) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Jerry T. Yen (SBN 247988, [e-mail]) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for GOOGLE INC. and AOL LLC By: /s/ Richard. S.J. Hung Michael A. Jacobs (CA Bar No. 111664) Richard S.J. Hung (CA Bar No. 197425) MORRISON & FOERSTER 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415-268-7522 Email: [e-mail] Attorneys for YAHOO! INC.

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE - Case No. C-08-03172-RMW sf-2706426

2

Case5:08-cv-03172-RMW Document117

Filed06/29/09 Page4 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

By: /s/ Jennifer A. Kash Claude M. Stern (CA Bar No. 96737) Jennifer A. Kash (CA Bar No. 203679) QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART 5 OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP 55 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Email: [e-mail] Email:[e-mail] Attorneys for IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC. and LYCOS, INC.

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE - Case No. C-08-03172-RMW sf-2706426

3

Case5:08-cv-03172-RMW Document117

Filed06/29/09 Page5 of 7

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE - Case No. C-08-03172-RMW sf-2706426

By: /s/ Thomas F. Smegal, Jr. Thomas F. Smegal, Jr. ([e-mail]) Law Offices of Thomas F. Smegal, Jr. One Sansome Street, 35th floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Lee Landa Kaplan ([e-mail]) (pro hac vice) Smyser Kaplan & Veselka, L.L.P. 700 Louisiana St., Suite 2300, Houston, TX 77002 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Jay D. Ellwanger ([e-mail]) Dinovo Price Ellwanger LLP P.O. Box 201690 Austin, Texas 78720 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for L. DANIEL EGGER, SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, and SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

4

Case5:08-cv-03172-RMW Document117

Filed06/29/09 Page6 of 7

1 2 3 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of 4 perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the above-listed 5 counsel. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE - Case No. C-08-03172-RMW sf-2706426

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

Dated: June 29, 2009 ____/s/ Richard S. J. Hung_______ Richard S. J. Hung

5

Case5:08-cv-03172-RMW Document117

Filed06/29/09 Page7 of 7

1 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Opposition

3 to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay (Dkt. No 42), and Defendants' Opposition to 4 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 64) will be due July 8, 2009, rather than July 2, 2009. Both 5 parties' reply papers in support of their respective motions will remain due July 17, 2009. 6 Additionally, Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay 7 may contain eight additional pages of text in excess of the page limit set forth in Civil Local Rule 8 7-4. Likewise, Defendants' Reply in Support of their Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay may 9 contain eight additional pages of text in excess of the page limit set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-4. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE - Case No. C-08-03172-RMW sf-2706426

Dated: ______________, 2009 ____________________________________ Hon. Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge

6