Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al

Filing 136

STIPULATION of L. Daniel Egger by L. Daniel Egger, Software Rights Archive LLC. (Kaplan, Lee) (Filed on 9/10/2009)

Download PDF
Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al Doc. 136 Case5:08-cv-03172-RMW Document136 Filed09/10/09 Page1 of 3 1 [SEE SIGNATURE BLOCK F O R COUNSEL] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 UNITED S T A T E S D I S T R I C T C O U R T NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN J O S E D I V I S I O N G O O G L E INC., A O L L L C , YAHOO! INC., l A C S E A R C H & M E D I A , I N C . , a n d L Y C O S , INC. Plaintiffs C a s e No. CV08-03172RMW S T I P U L A T I O N O F L. D A N I E L E G G E R v. L. D A N I E L E G G E R , S O F T W A R E RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, and SITE T E C H N O L O G I E S , INC. Defendants 18 19 20 L. Daniel Egger hereby stipulates that he does not now and will not in the future assert any ownership rights in U.S. Patent No. 5,544,352, U.S. Patent No. 5,832,494, and U.S. Patent No. 6,233,571 (the "patents-in-suit"). Egger further stipulates that his only interest related to the patents-in-suit is the potential for receiving additional payments by or on behalf o f Software Rights Archive, LLC, either on a consulting basis in connection with litigation involving the patents-in-suit, or as residual compensation for the sale o f Software Rights Archive, LLC, which depends on the outcome o f litigation involving the patents-in-suit. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S T I P U L A T I O N OF L. DANIEL E G G E R C A S E NO. CV08-03172 Dockets.Justia.com Case5:08-cv-03172-RMW Document136 Filed09/10/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 I , L. Daniel Egger, declare under penalty o f perjury under the laws o f the United States o f America that the foregoing Stipulation is true and correct. 3 4 5 6 7 - 8 9 10 11 nom as . Smegal, Jr. (Bar No. 34,81 O n e S a n s o m e Street, 3 5 t h F l o o r San Francisco, C A 94104 Telephone: ( 4 1 5 ) 217-8383 F a c s i m i l e : ( 4 1 5 ) 399-5093 Email: t o m s m e g a l @ s m e g a l l a w . c o m Lee L. Kaplan (Texas B a r No. 11094400) J e f f r e y A . Potts (Texas B a r No. 00784781) Raj Duvvuri (Texas B a r No. 24054185) ( a d m i t t e d p r o h a c vice) 700 L o u i s i a n a Street, S u i t e 2 3 0 0 Houston, T X 77002 Telephone: (713) 2 2 1 - 2 3 0 0 F a c s i m i l e : (713) 2 2 1 - 2 3 2 0 Email: l k a p l a n @ s k v . c o m Jay D. Ellwanger (California B a r No. 217747)) DiNovo Price Ellwanger & H a r d y LLP 7000 N o r t h M o P a c E x p r e s s w a y Suite 3 5 0 Austin, Texas 78731 T e l e p h o n e : (512) 5 3 9 - 2 6 3 0 Facsimile: (512) 539-2627 Email: j e l l w a n g e r @ d p e l a w . c o m Attorneys for Defendant L. Daniel Egger and Software R i g h t s A r c h i v e , L L C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF L. DANIEL EGGER C A S E NO. C V 0 8 - 0 3 1 7 2 2 Case5:08-cv-03172-RMW Document136 Filed09/10/09 Page3 of 3 1 C E R T I F I C A T E O F SERVICE I h e r e b y certify t h a t a t r u e a n d c o r r e c t c o p y o f t h e above a n d foregoing i n s t r u m e n t h a s all counsel o f record pursuant to Federal Rules f Civil Procedure o n this the ~ a a y o f S e p t e m b e r , 2009. . bee~arded to 2 3 4 5 Juanita R. Brooks Jason W. W o l f f F i s h & R i c h a r d s o n P.C. 12390 EI Camino Real S a n Diego, C a l i f o r n i a 9 2 1 3 0 Thomas B. Walsh, IV F i s h & R i c h a r d s o n P.C. 5000 B a n k O n e C e n t e r 1717 M a i n St. Dallas, Texas 75201 R a m o n K. T a b t i a n g Stephen A. Marshall Fish & Richardson P . e . 225 Franklin Street Boston, Massachusetts 0 2 1 1 0 - 2 8 0 4 Michael A. Jacobs Richard S J . H u n g Morrison & Foerster 425 M a r k e t S t r e e t S a n Francisco, C A 94105 Claude M. S t e m Jennifer A. Kash Quinn Emanuel U r q u h a r t Oliver & Hedges, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 R e d w o o d Shores, C A 9 4 0 6 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULA T I O N OF L . D A N I E L E G G E R C A S E NO. C V 0 8 - 0 3 1 7 2 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?