Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al
Filing
164
Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al
Doc. 164
Case M:06-cv-01791-VRW
Document 159-2
Filed 02/07/2007
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Ronald L. Motley (SC Bar # RM-2730) Jodi Westbrook Flowers (SC Bar # 66300) Donald Migliori, (RI Bar # 4963; MA Bar # 567562; and MN Bar # 0245951) Vincent I. Parrett (CA Bar # 237563) MOTLEY RICE LLC 28 Bridgeside Boulevard P.O. Box 1792 Mount Pleasant, South Carolina 29465 Telephone: (843) 216-9000 Facsimile: (843) 216-9027 MDL1791@motleyrice.com Interim Class Counsel UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (San Francisco Division) ) ) ) ) ) This Document Relates To: ) ) ALL CASES BROUGHT AGAINST ) DEFENDANTS TRANSWORLD NETWORK ) ) CORP., COMCAST TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., T-MOBILE ) ) USA, INC., AND MCLEODUSA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. ) ) ) ) ) ) IN RE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION, MDL No. 1791 MDL Docket No 06-1791 VRW [PROPOSED] ORDER ON NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Courtroom: Judge:
6, 17th Floor The Hon. Vaughn R. Walker
MDL Docket No. M-06-01791-VRW
ORDER ON NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case M:06-cv-01791-VRW
Document 159-2
Filed 02/07/2007
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Plaintiffs, by counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby file this notice of dismissal without prejudice of Defendant, T-Mobile USA, Inc. Dated this ___ day of ___________, 2007.
_____________________________________ ED Hon. Vaughn R. Walker RDER OO S
UNIT ED
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
RT U O
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
N
Date: February 14, 2007
F D IS T IC T O R
MDL Docket No. M-06-01791-VRW
ORDER ON NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF T-MOBILE USA, INC.
A
9
ER
C
LI
FO
8
aughn R Judge V
Walker
R NIA
IT IS
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?