Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al

Filing 66

Proposed Order re 64 MOTION to Strike 42 MOTION to Dismiss , Transfer or Stay by Yahoo! Inc.. (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 1/20/2009)

Download PDF
Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al Doc. 66 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 ATTORNEYS FOR YAHOO! INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, YAHOO! INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., and LYCOS, INC., Plaintiffs, v. L. DANIEL EGGER, SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, and SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants. Case No. C-08-03172-RMW [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY HEARING REQUESTED Date: February 27, 2009 Time: 9:00 AM Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: YAHOO!'S MOTION TO STRIKE Case No. C-08-03172-RMW sf-2627969 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Dated: ______, 2009 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Site Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay under the First-to-File Rule, under Rule 12(b)(2) for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, and under Rule 12(b)(1) for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Docket 42) is therefore stricken to the extent that the motion purports to be brought on behalf of Site Technologies, Inc. By: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: YAHOO!'S MOTION TO STRIKE Case No. C-08-03172-RMW sf-2627969 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?