Avago Technologies U.S., Inc et al v. Venture Corporation Limited
Filing
161
ORDER continuing preliminary pretrial conference. Signed by Judge James Ware on November 8, 2011. (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
NO. C 08-03248 JW
Avago Technologies U.S., Inc., et al.,
11
ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
Plaintiffs,
v.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Venture Corporation Ltd., et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
/
15
This case is scheduled for a Pretrial Conference on November 14, 2011. On November 2,
16
2011, the parties filed a Joint Notice Regarding Settlement Status. (Docket Item No. 160.) In their
17
Joint Notice, the parties contend that Plaintiff and Defendant Emcore “have reached a settlement and
18
have a fully-executed settlement agreement,” and also contend that they “anticipate that a stipulation
19
for dismissal will be filed in the next 30 days.” (Id. at 2.) Further, the parties contend that Plaintiff
20
and Defendant Venture “are in continued negotiations as to the details of their settlement,” and also
21
contend that “the clients’ principals are communicating directly to discuss and agree upon the terms
22
of the resolution.” (Id.) Finally, the parties contend that the Court should modify the current case
23
schedule to provide the parties “sufficient time for the resolution” of their settlement negotiations.
24
(Id.)
25
In light of the parties’ contentions regarding their settlement efforts, the Court finds good
26
cause to CONTINUE the Preliminary Pretrial Conference to January 23, 2012 at 11 a.m. On or
27
before January 13, 2012, the parties shall file a Joint Preliminary Pretrial Statement apprising the
28
1
Court of the parties’ settlement efforts, and providing a good faith trial schedule in the event that the
2
parties are unable to bring their settlement to a final resolution. Should the parties require additional
3
time to reduce their settlement to a writing, the parties should specify the time needed.
4
5
6
Dated: November 8, 2011
JAMES WARE
United States District Chief Judge
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO:
2
Caroline Ann Haugsten Sayers csayers@whitecase.com
Desiree DeSurra ddesurra@whitecase.com
Dori Lynn Yob dyob@hopkinscarley.com
Erik Paul Khoobyarian epk@hopkinscarley.com
Gary Fish Redenbacher Gary@RedBrownLaw.com
James Jonathan Hawk jhawk@whitecase.com
John Calvin Brown jbrown@redbrownlaw.com
John V. Picone jpicone@hopkinscarley.com
Matthew Paul Lewis mlewis@whitecase.com
3
4
5
6
7
Dated: November 8, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
By:
/s/ JW Chambers
Susan Imbriani
Courtroom Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?