Avago Technologies U.S., Inc et al v. Venture Corporation Limited

Filing 161

ORDER continuing preliminary pretrial conference. Signed by Judge James Ware on November 8, 2011. (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION NO. C 08-03248 JW Avago Technologies U.S., Inc., et al., 11 ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Plaintiffs, v. For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Venture Corporation Ltd., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 This case is scheduled for a Pretrial Conference on November 14, 2011. On November 2, 16 2011, the parties filed a Joint Notice Regarding Settlement Status. (Docket Item No. 160.) In their 17 Joint Notice, the parties contend that Plaintiff and Defendant Emcore “have reached a settlement and 18 have a fully-executed settlement agreement,” and also contend that they “anticipate that a stipulation 19 for dismissal will be filed in the next 30 days.” (Id. at 2.) Further, the parties contend that Plaintiff 20 and Defendant Venture “are in continued negotiations as to the details of their settlement,” and also 21 contend that “the clients’ principals are communicating directly to discuss and agree upon the terms 22 of the resolution.” (Id.) Finally, the parties contend that the Court should modify the current case 23 schedule to provide the parties “sufficient time for the resolution” of their settlement negotiations. 24 (Id.) 25 In light of the parties’ contentions regarding their settlement efforts, the Court finds good 26 cause to CONTINUE the Preliminary Pretrial Conference to January 23, 2012 at 11 a.m. On or 27 before January 13, 2012, the parties shall file a Joint Preliminary Pretrial Statement apprising the 28 1 Court of the parties’ settlement efforts, and providing a good faith trial schedule in the event that the 2 parties are unable to bring their settlement to a final resolution. Should the parties require additional 3 time to reduce their settlement to a writing, the parties should specify the time needed. 4 5 6 Dated: November 8, 2011 JAMES WARE United States District Chief Judge 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: 2 Caroline Ann Haugsten Sayers csayers@whitecase.com Desiree DeSurra ddesurra@whitecase.com Dori Lynn Yob dyob@hopkinscarley.com Erik Paul Khoobyarian epk@hopkinscarley.com Gary Fish Redenbacher Gary@RedBrownLaw.com James Jonathan Hawk jhawk@whitecase.com John Calvin Brown jbrown@redbrownlaw.com John V. Picone jpicone@hopkinscarley.com Matthew Paul Lewis mlewis@whitecase.com 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: November 8, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ JW Chambers Susan Imbriani Courtroom Deputy

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?