Levitte v. Google Inc.

Filing 10

Declaration of Willem F. Jonckheer in Support of Plaintiff Hal K. Levitte's Administrative 9 Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related filed by Hal K. Levitte. (Jonckheer, Willem) (Filed on 9/3/2008) Modified on 9/3/2008 (counsel failed to properly link to motion.)(cv, COURT STAFF).

Levitte v. Google Inc.

Doc. 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S C H U B E R T JONCKHEER KOLBE & KRALOWEC LLP 8 9 10
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 San Francisco, CA 94111 [phone]

ROBERT C. SCHUBERT S.B.N. 62684 WILLEM F. JONCKHEER S.B.N. 178748 KIMBERLY A. KRALOWEC S.B.N. 163158 SCHUBERT JONCKHEER KOLBE & KRALOWEC LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Hal K. Levitte

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant. v.

HAL K. LEVITTE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,

Case No. C 08-03369 JW DECLARATION OF WILLEM F. JONCKHEER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF HAL K. LEVITTE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED Judge: Hon. James Ware

GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation,

I, Willem F. Jonckheer, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney duly licensed by the State of California and am admitted to practice before this Court. I am a partner at Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec LLP, attorneys of record for plaintiff in Levitte v. Google, Inc., Case No. C 08-03369 ("Levitte"). I make this declaration in support of plaintiff Hal K. Levitte's Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related. The matters set forth herein are of my own personal knowledge, and if called and sworn as a witness I could completely testify regarding them.
DECLARATION OF WILLEM F. JONCKHEER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF HAL K. LEVITTE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S C H U B E R T JONCKHEER KOLBE & KRALOWEC LLP 8 9 10
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 San Francisco, CA 94111 [phone]

2. 3. 4.

Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of a complaint captioned RK Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of a complaint captioned A stipulation pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11(a) with defendant Google, Inc.

West, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Case No. C 08-03452, pending before Judge Whyte. Pulaski & Middleman, LLC v. Google Inc., Case No. C 08-03888, pending before Judge Illston. ("Google") could not be obtained. Counsel for Google has proposed that Levitte, RK West, and Pulaski be related to another action involving Google currently pending before Judge Whyte, captioned Almeida v. Google, Inc., No. 08-02088. However, that action is factually and legally distinct from the actions at issue here, and plaintiff does not believe that the cases are related. 5. Unlike Almeida, the three cases at issue in this motion concern Google's inclusion of low-quality parked domain and error page websites within its AdWords advertising program. The lowest filed of these cases is pending before Judge Ware. Therefore, plaintiff Levitte believes that the other two cases should be related to Levitte, for proceedings before Judge Ware. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 3rd day of September, 2008 in San Francisco, California. _________________/s/_______________ Willem F. Jonckheer

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DECLARATION OF WILLEM F. JONCKHEER IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF HAL K. LEVITTE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

2

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT B