Levitte v. Google Inc.
ORDER RELATING CASE C08-3369 JW and C09-3414 JL. It is further ordered THAT THIS ORDER VACATES the previous 52 Order Denying Motion to Relate Cases. Create association to 3:09-cv-03414-JL. Signed by Judge James Ware on 8/21/2009. CLERK'S NOTICE As to case number C09-3414 JL, the court vacates the previous case management conference and and resets it to coordinate with the consolidated action on 9/14/09 at 10:00am. The Parties are to file a joint case management conference statement by 9/4/09.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2009) Modified text on 8/21/2009 (cv, COURT STAFF). Modified on 8/25/2009 (cv, COURT STAFF). Modified on 8/25/2009 (cv, COURT STAFF). Modified text re CMC time on 8/26/2009 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
Levitte v. Google Inc.
Filed08/21/09 Page1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RELATED CASE ORDER A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination. C 08-03369 JW C 09-03414 JL
In re Google AdWords Litigation Olabode v. Google Inc.,
I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me.
ORDER Counsel are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge. It is further ordered that this order VACATES the previous Order denying motion to relate cases. Dated: August 21, 2009 Judge James Ware
Filed08/21/09 Page2 of 3
CLERK'S NOTICE As to Case Number C-09-03414 JL, the Court vacates the previous case management conference and resets it to coordinate with the consolidated action on September 14, 2009 at 10:00 AM. The parties are to file a joint case management conference statement by September 4, 2009.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on the date stated below, I lodged a copy of this order with each judicial officer and I mailed a copy to each counsel of record or pro se party in the cases listed above. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk DATED: August 21, 2009 By: Deputy Clerk
Filed08/21/09 Page3 of 3
Copies to: Courtroom Deputies Case Systems Administrators Counsel of Record Entered into Assignment Program:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?