Levitte v. Google Inc.
Filing
7
Proposed Order re 5 MOTION to Relate Case by Pulaski & Middleman, LLC. (Saveri, Guido) (Filed on 9/2/2008)
Levitte v. Google Inc.
Doc. 7
1,
2
J
4
5 6
.7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
1'1,
12
13
1.4
HAL K. LEVITTE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff.
V.
Case No. 08-03369-JV/
IPROPOSEDI ORDER RELATTNG CASES
15 16
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
17
18
This Document Relates to:
19
20
21.
PULASKI & MIDDLEMAN, LLC, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff.
V.
22 23
GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation,
24
25
Defendant.
26 27
28
IPROPOSEDI ORDER RELATTNG CASES
Dockets.Justia.com
1,
On September 2,2008, plaintiff Pulaski & Middleman,LLC filed an Administrative
2
J ^
Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related Cases pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12.
The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. The Court having considered the papers and pleadings on file, and good cause appearing,
4
5 6
HEREBY GRANTS Plaintiff
s
Administrative Motion to Relate Cases.
cases are related:
IT IS SO ORDERED that the following
7
Levitte v. Google, Inc., Case No. 08-03369-JW;
I
9
RKll/est, Inc. v. Google, Inc.,CaseNo.08-03452-RS; and
Pulaski & Middleman, LLC v. Google, Inc., Case No. 08-3888-5I.
10
11,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13 Dated:
't4
15
The Honorable James Ware United States District Judge
16
17
18 19 20
21,
22 23 24 25 26
27
28
2
IPROPOSED] ORDER RELATING CASES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?