Levitte v. Google Inc.
Filing
87
ORDER Granting 85 Motion for Expert Discovery Scheduling. Signed by Judge James Ware on 4/26/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 S C H U B E R T JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP 10
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 788-4220
ROBERT C. SCHUBERT S.B.N. 62684 WILLEM F. JONCKHEER S.B.N. 178748 SCHUBERT JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 788-4220 Facsimile: (415) 788-0161 Email: rschubert@schubertlawfirm.com Email: wjonckheer@schubertlawfirm.com Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This Document Relates to: All Actions
IN RE GOOGLE ADWORDS LITIGATION
Case No. 08-3369 JW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF REGARDING EXPERT DISCOVERY SCHEDULING [LR 7-11, 16-2(d)]
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Administrative Relief Regarding Expert Discovery Scheduling
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 S C H U B E R T JONCKHEER & KOLBE LLP 10
Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1650 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 788-4220
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Administrative Relief Regarding Expert Discovery Scheduling is hereby granted: (1) initial expert reports regarding class certification shall be exchanged on July 19, 2010; (2) any rebuttal expert reports shall be exchanged and all expert discovery regarding class certification shall be completed by August 20, 2010; and (3) all remaining dates for class certification established by the Court's March 8, 2010 order [Docket #82] shall remain unchanged.
Dated:
April 26, 2010 _______________________________ Hon. James Ware
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Administrative Relief Regarding Expert Discovery Scheduling
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?