Kidgell v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 29

ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE from 6/15/2009 to 7/6/2009. Joint Case Management Conference Statement due on or before 6/26/2009. The Statement shall include, among other things, the parties proposed trial schedule. Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 7/6/2009 11:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge James Ware on 6/10/2009. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Gary Kidgell, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 08-03396 JW ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 County of Santa Clara, et al., Defendants. / This case was scheduled for a Preliminary Pretrial Conference on June 15, 2009. However, in light of Plaintiff's pending deadline to file Notice of Identification of Substitute Counsel or Notice of Self Representation, the Court CONTINUES the Preliminary Pretrial Conference to July, 6 2009 at 11 a.m. The parties shall meet and confer and file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement on or before June 26, 2009. The Statement shall include, among other things, the parties proposed trial schedule. Dated: June 10, 2009 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: David Michael Rollo david.rollo@cco.sccgov.org Norman Charles Newhouse norm@normannewhouse.com Rima Harbans Singh rima.singh@cco.sccgov.org Gary Kidgwell 854 Harrison St., Unit B Santa Clara, CA 95050 Dated: June 10, 2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?