Kidgell v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 78

INTERIM ORDER re 62 Defendant County of Santa Clara's motion to compel. 3/2/2010 motion hearing is vacated. County to file status report by 3/1/2010. Matter to be deemed submitted on the papers. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 2/22/2010. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION GARY HOWARD KIDGELL, v. Plaintiff, No. C08-03396 JW (HRL) INTERIM ORDER RE DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA'S MOTION TO COMPEL *E-FILED 02-22-2010*

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SHERIFF'S DEPT.; COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA OFFICERS WHEELER #2595, QUIRO #2705, CUNNINGHAM #2699, TAIARIOL #2701, ROGGY #2365, ROHDES #1712, HELIKSON #2016, ASBAN #1939, DEPUTY MORIN #0321; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION STAFF LOUELLA MANZANO AND DOES 1 through 50, Defendants. /

Defendant County of Santa Clara ("County") moves for an order compelling pro se plaintiff Gary Kidgell to produce documents. This court has not received any opposition to that motion. And, based on the County's reply papers, it appears that there is no dispute as to whether and what documents should be produced. The only question is when plaintiff should produce (or should have already produced) them. This court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument, and the March 2, 2010 motion hearing is vacated. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). No later than March 1, 2010, the County shall file a status report either (a) identifying the specific documents that remain outstanding or (b) confirming that the matter has been

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

resolved and that the motion is moot. Assuming that the matter is not resolved, the motion will then be deemed submitted on the papers. SO ORDERED. Dated: February 22, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

5:08-cv-03396-JW Notice electronically mailed to: David Michael Rollo Neysa A. Fligor [e-mail], [e-mail]

[e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail]

Rima Harbans Singh

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. 5:08-cv-03396-JW Notice mailed to: Gary Howard Kidgell 228 Spruce Street Wichita, KS 67214 Pro Se Plaintiff

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3