Kidgell v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 80

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd granting 62 defendant County of Santa Clara's Motion to Compel. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NOT FOR CITATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION GARY HOWARD KIDGELL, v. Plaintiff, No. C08-03396 JW (HRL) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA'S MOTION TO COMPEL [Re: Docket No. 62] *E-FILED 03-02-2010*

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SHERIFF'S DEPT.; COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA OFFICERS WHEELER #2595, QUIRO #2705, CUNNINGHAM #2699, TAIARIOL #2701, ROGGY #2365, ROHDES #1712, HELIKSON #2016, ASBAN #1939, DEPUTY MORIN #0321; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION STAFF LOUELLA MANZANO AND DOES 1 through 50, Defendants. /

Defendant County of Santa Clara ("County") moves for an order compelling pro se plaintiff Gary Kidgell to produce documents. This court has not received any opposition to that motion. And, on February 22, 2010, this court issued an interim order (Docket No. 78) (a) directing the County to file a status report on March 1, 2010 as to the discovery sought; and (b) stating that the matter would then be deemed submitted on the papers. As noted in this court's interim order, it appears that there is no dispute as to whether and what documents should be produced. The only question is when plaintiff should produce (or should have already produced) them. The County reports that plaintiff still has not produced

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

the promised documents that he reportedly agreed to provide by January 27, 2010 and February 28, 2010. Accordingly, the County's motion is granted as follows: within ten days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall produce the outstanding documents responsive to the County's requests -- i.e., his email communications with his clients and his 2006, 2007 and 2008 tax returns. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 2, 2010 HOWARD R. LLOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

5:08-cv-03396-JW Notice electronically mailed to: David Michael Rollo Neysa A. Fligor [e-mail], [e-mail]

[e-mail] [e-mail], [e-mail]

Rima Harbans Singh

Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. 5:08-cv-03396-JW Notice mailed to: Gary Howard Kidgell 228 Spruce Street Wichita, KS 67214 Pro Se Plaintiff

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3