Hernandez et al v. United Auto Credit Corporation

Filing 145

STIPULATION AND ORDER 131 to Shorten Time for Hearing and Briefing Schedu.le Regarding Defendant's Rule 56(f) Motion. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 10/20/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2009)

1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20

Counsel on Following Page

*E-FILED - 10/20/09*

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Santiago Hernandez, et al., individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public Plaintiffs,
vs.

Case No. COS 03404 RMW/PVT
xxxxxxxxx STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANT'S RULE 56(F) MOTION

United Auto Credit Corporation, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants.

21
22 23 24 25 26

27 28
STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PARTIES TO COMPLETE MEDIATION

xxxxx

2
3

4
5
6

NICHOLS RASTER, LLP Matthew C. Helland, CA State Bar No. 250451 [e-mail] One Embarcadero Center, Suite 720 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415-277-7238 NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP Paul J. Lukas, MN State Bar No. 22084X [e-mail] (admitted pro hac vice) Michele R. Fisher, MN Bar No. 303069 (admitted pro hac vice) 4600 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Individual and Representative Plaintiffs FERMIN H. LLAGUNO, Bar No. 185222 D. CHAD ANDERTON, Bar No. MARIA R. HARRINGTON, Bar No. 201901 LITTLER MENDELSON A Professional Corporation 2050 Main Street Suite 900 Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 949.724.1201 Email: [e-mail] canderton@littler. com mharrington@littler. com

7
8

o 10
11

12 13
14

15
16

17 18
ig

20

22
23 24 25 26 27 28

STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING AND BRIEFING RE RULE S6(f) MOTION

xxxxx

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14

By stipulation and agreement of the parties, and for purposes of the efficiency of holding the hearings of all pending motions on the same date, September 11, 2009, the parties hereby stipulate that the hearing on Defendant's Motion, Pursuant to Rule 56(f) For Denial Of, Or In The Alternative, Continuance Of Plaintiffs' Motion For Partial Summary Judgment, be rescheduled for September 11, 2009 (instead of the previously scheduled September 25, 2009) so that the hearing date matches that of Defendant's Motion to Decertify the Conditional FLSA Class, Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To File Second Amended Complaint. The parties further stipulate to a shortened briefing schedule as to Defendant's Motion, Pursuant To Rule 56(f) For Denial Of, Or In The Alternative, Continuance Of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as follows: Plaintiffs' opposition brief shall be due on September 1, 2009 and Defendant's reply brief shall be due by 10 a.m. on September 8, 2009. Dated: August 27, 2009 NICHOLS KASTER, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs By: /s/ Matthew C. Helland Matthew C. Helland

16
17

18 !9 20

LITTLER MENDELSON Attorneys for Defendant By: 7s/ D. Chad Anderton D. Chad Anderton

22

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
23

24 25
26
27

Dated: 10/20/09 Hon. Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Judge
Firmwide:91733416.1060715.1001

28
STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING AND BRIEFING RE RULE 56(f) MOTION

xxxxx