RSI Corporation v. International Business Machines Corporation et al
Filing
218
ORDER by Judge Whyte re 210 Discovery Dispute (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
RSI CORP., dba RESPONSIVE SYSTEMS
11 COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation,
12
13
CASE NO. 5:08-cv-3414 RMW
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE
REPORT NO. 1
vs.
14 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
CORPORATION; and DOES DEFENDANTS
15 1-20,
16
Defendants.
17
18
As to each entity that has licensed BPA, DB2PE, or OMPE from IBM since February 15,
19 2004, IBM will conduct a diligent search for responsive communications made between IBM
20 representatives in the United States and said entities during the respective one year periods leading
21 up to each entity licensing BPA, DB2PE, or OMPE.
22
IBM will conduct a diligent search for responsive communications made between IBM
23 representatives in the United States and actual RSI customers since February 15, 2003. IBM will
24 use RSI's supplemented interrogatory responses as the basis for determining RSI's customers.
25
The court expects that IBM will use appropriate technology including keyword searching
26 to minimize the burden of this discovery obligation.
27
IBM will also identify the software and functionalities included in DB2PE and OMPE as
28 per RSI's interrogatories 18 and 19.
1
1
It is so ordered.
2
DATED: October, 5 2012
3
4
5
Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?