RSI Corporation v. International Business Machines Corporation et al

Filing 285

ORDER by Judge Whyte granting in part and denying in part 272 273 Discovery Letter Briefs. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. C-08-03414 RMW RSI CORP., dba RESPONSIVE SYSTEMS COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation, ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE 2 & 3 vs. [Re Docket Nos. 272, 273] INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, a New York corporation; and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-20, 16 Defendants. 17 18 The court orders as follows: 1. IBM's request for an order requiring RSI "produce documents and allow testimony 19 20 regarding its negotiations with Computer Associates" is DENIED; 2. RSI has represented that it "will conduct a reasonable search in response to IBM's 21 request [about documents related to payments to Folium] and will produce any 22 relevant, non-privileged responsive documents." The court orders RSI to do so 23 24 by March 1, 2013. 3. RSI's request for production of IBM's litigation-related document retention 25 notice(s) is DENIED. 26 27 28 ORDER CASE NO. C-08-03414 SW -1- 1 4. IBM has represented that "it has conducted a reasonable search but has not located 2 any audit-related . . . document retention notice." Therefore, RSI's request for 3 an order that IBM produce such documents is DENIED as moot. 4 5. IBM has represented that it will "undertake a reasonable search for the 5 document(s) referred to by IBM's witness in a recent 30(b)(6) deposition" with 6 regard to pricing documents and that it has already produced some of these 7 documents. The court orders IBM to complete its search and produce any 8 relevant, non-privileged responsive documents by March 1, 2013. 9 10 11 Dated: February 14, 2013 Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER CASE NO. C-08-03414 SW -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?