Fibertrek, Inc. et al v. Preferred Corporate Services, Inc. et al

Filing 104

ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL; SETTING HEARING FOR ANTICIPATED MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT. ***OSC Deadlines terminated. Motion Hearing set for 9/20/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Defendants shall notice and file the Motions in accordance with the Civil Local Rules of the Court. Failure to file the Motions in a timely matter may result in a Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) dismissal. Signed by Judge James Ware on 7/9/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2010)

Download PDF
Fibertrek, Inc. et al v. Preferred Corporate Services, Inc. et al Doc. 104 UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N F D IS T IC T O R ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL; SETTING HEARING FOR ANTICIPATED MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT On June 24, 2010, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause re: Dismissal in light of Plaintiffs' failure to comply with the Court's order to keep the Court updated as to the state of Plaintiffs' settlement efforts with Defendants. (Docket Item No. 100.) On July 8, 2010, counsel for Plaintiffs filed a Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause. (Docket Item No. 103.) In light of the representation made in counsel's declaration, the Court finds good cause VACATE the July 12, 2010 hearing on the Order to Show Cause. In light of the Clerk's entry of default as to the remaining Defendants, the Court sets September 20, 2010 at 9 a.m. for hearing on Defendants' anticipated Motions for Default Judgment. Defendants shall notice and file the Motions in accordance with the Civil Local Rules of the Court. Failure to file the Motions in a timely matter may result in a Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) dismissal. Dated: July 9, 2010 ____________________________ JAMES WARE United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com A C LI FO m Judge Ja es Ware R NIA D RDERE IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?