JDS Uniphase Corp. v. Syntune, AB et al

Filing 61

ORDER 60 of Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 4/16/09. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

NATALIE HANLON-LEH (Admitted pro hac vice) nhanlo [e-mail] DAVID J.F. GROSS (Admitted pro hac vice) dgro [e-mail] MARY V. SOOTER (Admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] m TIMOTHY E. GRIMSRUD (Admitted pro hac vice) [e-mail] m FAEGRE & BENSON LLP 3200 Wells Fargo Center 1700 Lincoln Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 303-607-3600 HEATHER N. MEWES (CSB No. 203690) [e-mail] LAUREN E. WHITTEMORE (CSB No. 255432) [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415-281-1350 Attorneys for Plaintiff JDS Uniphase Corporation and

*E-FILED - 4/16/09*

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION JDS UNIPHASE, a Delaware Corporation, Plaint iff, v. SYNTUNE, AB, a Swedish corporation; CYOPTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation Defendants. Case No.: C 08-03498-RMW [] ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

-1-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Pursuant to a stipulation by and between Plaintiff JDS Uniphase Corporation ("DSU", on J ) the one hand, and Defendants Syntune, AB and CyOptics, Inc., (collectively, " efendants", on the D ) other, by and through their respective counsel, it is hereby order that this all claims and counterclaims in this case be dismissed with prejudice, with each side bearing its own costs and attorneys'fees. This dismissal is pursuant to a settlement agreement between JDSU and Defendants and is not intended nor will it affect any of the claims or counterclaims in the matter of Bookham, Inc. v. JDS Uniphase, et al., Case No. 5:08-CV-01275-RMW. IT IS SO ORDERED.

4/16 DATED: _____________________, 2009.

_______________________________________ Judge Ronald M. Whyte

-2-