Higdon v. AT&T Corp et al
Filing
75
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 74 CONTINUING MOTION HEARING TO 04/01/2010 AT 1:30 PM. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 03/02/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2010)
<![CDATA[
WALID S. ARDIJL-RAHIM (State Bar No. 141940) J. SCOTT PAISLEY, (Stare Bar NO. 094236 AT&'I' SEKVIC'E, INC. LEGAL, DEPARTMENT 525 Market Street. Suite 2005 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (4 15) 778- 1 356 Facsimile: (4 15) 882-4458 Attorneys for Defendant Pacific Bell Telephone Company
*E-Filed 03/02/2010*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
JOE-JN M. HIGI)ON, et al.,
Plaintiff, vs. PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY dba AT&T CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, et a1 Defetldant .
/ Case No. (208-03526
COMPANY'S MOTION PLAINTIFF'S FOURTH QMPLAINT AND
Hearing Date: March 1 8, 20 10 ew Hearing Date: April 1, 2010 1 :30 p.m.
Pacific Re11 Telephone Company's current deadline to file its reply bricf in regard to its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint and Motiorl to Strike Improper Allegations is March 4,2010. Due to an unexpected family emergency of co-counsel, and counsel being currently out of town, Pacific Bell 'Telephone Company is unable to tile its reply
brief in a timely manner. Therefore. Pacific Bell Telephone Cornpany and Plaintiff stipulate to
moving rhe hearing date on the lLZntion to April 1 , 2010 at 1 :30 p.m. Pacific Bell Telephone
77 LI
Company and Plaintiff further stipulate that Pacific Bell Telephone Company's rcpty bricf must
28
03/02/2010
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
