Dioptics Medical Products, Inc. v. Ideavillage Products Corp

Filing 18

ORDER on 16 Stipulated Extension of Time to Answer. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on 12/15/08. (pvtlc1) (Filed on 12/16/2008)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5894

David Bloch (SBN: 184530) [e-mail] Andrew P. Bridges (SBN: 122761) [e-mail] Nicole M. Norris (SBN: 222785) [e-mail] WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5894 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415-591-1400 Attorneys for Plaintiff DIOPTICS MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DIOPTICS MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., a California Corporation ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORP., dba HD ) VISION, a New Jersey Corporation ) ) Defendant. ) ) Case No. CV 08-3538 (PVT)
ORDER ON

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Winston & Strawn LLP

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER WHEREAS, Defendant IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORP., dba HD VISION, a New Jersey Corporation, requested from Plaintiff DIOPTICS MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., a California Corporation a further thirty (30) day extension of time to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint served on July 28, 2008; WHEREAS, the parties still are currently engaged in mutual settlement discussions, have exchanged draft settlement agreements, and Plaintiff has again agreed to extend the Defendant's time to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by an additional thirty (30) days; WHEREAS, Plaintiff agreed to grant Defendant such extension, granting Defendant until 1
STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER CV 08-3538
SF:223994.2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5894

January 16, 2009, to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint; WHEREAS, Plaintiff has recently been sold to FGXi, and as part of this transaction one of the patents in suit has been transferred to non-party Live Eyewear, which now must evaluate how to proceed with respect to the transferred patent; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for Plaintiff and Defendant, that Defendant's answer to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be due on or before January 16, 2008.

Dated: December 11, 2008

WINSTON & STRAWN By: /s/ David S. Bloch_____ David S. Bloch Andrew P. Bridges Nicole M. Norris Attorneys for Plaintiff DIOPTICS MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Dated: December 11, 2008

Winston & Strawn LLP

EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES, LLP By: /s/ Jason M. Drangel_____ Jason M. Drangel Attorneys for Defendant IDEAVILLAGE PRODUCTS CORP., dba HD VISION.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _
12/15/08 _____

____________By:

__________________ Hon. Patricia V. Trumbull United States District Court Northern District of California

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER CV 08-3538
SF:223994.2