Tavant Technologies, Inc. v. Long Beach Acceptance Corp

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TAVANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. TO RESPOND TO COUNTERCLAIMS ALLEGED BY LONG BEACH ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION re 12 Stipulation filed by Tavant Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Patricia V. Trumbull on November 3, 2008. (pvtlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2008)

Case 5:08-cv-03582-PVT

Document 12

Filed 10/23/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 11
A Professional Corporation San Jose

MICHAEL J. IOANNOU (SBN 95208) [e-mail] ELISE R. VASQUEZ (SBN 201190) [e-mail] ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 50 West San Fernando Street, Suite 1400 San Jose, CA 95113-2429 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff TAVANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

TAVANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaint iff, v. LONG BEACH ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

CASE NO. C08 3582 PVT STIPULATION THAT TAVANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HAVE AN EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO THE COUNTER-CLAIMS OF LONG BEACH ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION; XXXXXXXXXX [PROPOSED] ORDER Date: N/A Time: N/A Judge: Mag. Judge Patricia V. Trumbull

Plaint iff/Counter-defendant Tavant Technologies, Inc. ("Tavant") and Defendant/Counterclaimant Long Beach Acceptance Corporation ("LBAC"), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request the Court to issue an order that Tavant may have a 60-day extensio n, to and including December 29, 2008, to respond to the counterclaims of LBAC. Good cause exists for the requested extension as the parties would like to participate in an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge of this court as soon as possible to try to settle this matter. The parties are submitting a separate stipulation and proposed order to the Court for referral to a Magistrate Judge for a settlement conference once the parties are able to determine either Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg's or Magistrate Judge Howard Lloyd's
RC1/5204185.1/NB

Stip. Re Extension to Respond to Counterclaims; [Proposed] Order C08 3582 PVT

Case 5:08-cv-03582-PVT

Document 12

Filed 10/23/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 11
A Profes sional Corporation San Jose

availability in December, 2008. It is so stipulated. Dated: October 23, 2008 ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

By: /s/ ELISE R. VASQUEZ Attorneys for Plaintiff TAVANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Dated: October 23, 2008 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
RC1/5204185.1/NB

By: /s/ CHAD R. FULLER Attorneys for Defendant LONG BEACH ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION I, Elise R. Vasquez, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that the other signatory has concurred in this filing. Dated: October 23, 2008 ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY

By: /s/ ELISE R. VASQUEZ Attorneys for Plaintiff TAVANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

-2-

Stip. Re Extension to Respond to Counterclaims; [Proposed] Order C08 3582

Case 5:08-cv-03582-PVT

Document 12

Filed 10/23/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 11
A Profes sional Corporation San Jose

ORDER Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. That Tavant Technologies, Inc. may have to and including December 29, 2008, to

file its response to the counterclaims of Long Beach Acceptance Corporation.
Novembe Dated:_________r 3,_____________ __ 2008

_________________________________________ PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL United States Chief Magistrate Judge

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
RC1/5204185.1/NB

-3-

Stip. Re Extension to Respond to Counterclaims; [Proposed] Order C08 3582