Motor Works, LLC v. Safer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 12

ORDER re 11 Stipulation, filed by Safer Technologies, Inc, Cerma Technology, Inc., Edward Halbach, Nicholas Streit, George Ackerman, Tim Streit, Mary Stranahan. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/1/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2225 DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP Peter E. Root (SBN 142348) E-mail: proot@dl.com Michael J. Rhee (SBN 226911) E-mail: mrhee@dl.com 1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 845-7000 Facsimile: (650) 845-7333 Attorneys for Defendants Safer Technologies, Inc., Cerma Technology, Inc., George Ackerson, Nicholas Streit, and Edward Halbach *E-FILED 10/1/08* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN JOSE DIVISION MOTOR WORKS LLC, Plaintiffs, SAFER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CERMA TECHNOLOGY, INC., GEORGE ACKERSON, MARY STRANAHAN, NICHOLAS STREIT, TIM STREIT and EDWARD HALBACH Defendants. Case No. 08-cv-03608-RS STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT DEWEY & LeBOEUF LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE: TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 08-cv-03608-RS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2225 WHEREAS counsel for plaintiff Motor Works LLC ("Motor Works") and the defendants Safer Technologies, Inc., Cerma Technology, Inc., George Ackerson, Nicholas Streit, and Edward Halbach ("Stipulating Defendants") have met and conferred regarding the time for responding to the Complaint; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Motor Works and the Stipulating Defendants, through their respective counsel, that: The time for the Stipulating Defendants to answer the Complaint is extended to October 2, 2008. Dated: September 30, 2008 Respectfully submitted, DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP By: /s/ Peter E. Root Peter E. Root (SBN 142348) E-mail: proot@dl.com Michael J. Rhee (SBN 226911) E-mail: mrhee@dl.com 1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 845-7000 Facsimile: (650) 845-7333 Attorneys for Defendants Safer Technologies, Inc., Cerma Technology, Inc., George Ackerson, Nicholas Streit, and Edward Halbach Dated: September 30, 2008 Respectfully submitted, WEEMS LAW OFFICES By: /s/ Robert C. Weems Robert C. Weems (SBN 148156) E-mail: rcweems@weemslawoffices.com 751 Center Blvd. Fairfax, CA 94930 Telephone: (415) 259-0294 Facsimile: (415) 259-0108 Attorneys for Plaintiff -1STIPULATION RE: TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 08-cv-03608-RS DEWEY & LeBOEUF LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2225 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I, Peter E. Root, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 30th day of September, 2008, at East Palo Alto, California. /s/ Peter E. Root Peter E. Root DEWEY & LeBOEUF LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION RE: TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 08-cv-03608-RS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1950 University Avenue, Suite 500 East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2225 [PROPOSED] ORDER Upon Stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/1/08 ______________________________________ The Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Magistrate Judge DEWEY & LeBOEUF LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION RE: TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 08-cv-03608-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?