Knopf v. Semel et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER Re: Continuance of Case Management Conference (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2009)

Download PDF
Case 5:08-cv-03658-RS Document 21 Filed 03/16/2009 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANNA ERICKSON WHITE (BAR NO. 161385) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 Telephone: (650) 813-5600 Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 JORDAN ETH (BAR NO. 121617) RACHAEL CLARKE (BAR NO. 248844) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-6000 Facsimile: (415) 268 7522 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT **E-Filed 3/16/09** NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ANDREW KNOPF Plaintiff, v. TERRY SEMEL, MICHAEL J. CALLAHAN, JERRY YANG, ROY J. BOSTOCK, RONALD W. BURKLE, ERIC HIPPEAU, VYOMESH JOSHI, ARTHUR H. KERN, ROBERT A. KOTICK, EDWARD R. KOZEL, GARY L. WILSON, and MAGGIE WILDEROTTER Defendants v. YAHOO! INC., a Delaware corporation, Nominal Defendant Case No. C-08-03658 (RS) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C-08-03658 Case 5:08-cv-03658-RS Document 21 Filed 03/16/2009 Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 // // // // // action; Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-2(d), Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, respectfully request that the Court grant, in the form of an Order, the parties' stipulated request to continue the status conference and set the initial case management schedule proposed below. In support of this stipulated request, the parties state as follows: WHEREAS, plaintiff filed his Complaint on July 30, 2008; WHEREAS, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties filed herewith, Defendants have to and including May 15, 2009 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint; WHEREAS, the parties have discussed, and intend to continue discussing, a resolution of this WHEREAS, the parties agree that those discussions will be facilitated by a continuance of the case management conference currently scheduled for April 22, 2009; NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court continue the case management conference and set the following initial case management schedule: Date June 3, 2009 Event Last day to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement Initial Case Management Conference. June 17, 2009 June 24, 2009 STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C-08-03658 2 Case 5:08-cv-03658-RS Document 21 Filed 03/16/2009 Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C-08-03658 3 March 16, 2009 Dated: ___________________ Dated: March 13, 2009 JORDAN ETH ANNA ERICKSON WHITE RACHAEL CLARKE MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Anna Erickson White Anna Erickson White Attorneys for Defendants Dated: March 13, 2009 JORDAN L. LURIE LEIGH A. PARKER ZEV B. ZYSMAN JOEL E. ELKINS WEISS & LURIE By: /s/ Leigh A. Parker Leigh A. Parker Attorneys for Plaintiff PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________________ Honorable Richard Seeborg United States Magistrate Judge GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION I, Rachael Clarke, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Continuance of Case Management Conference. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Anna Erickson White and Leigh A. Parker have concurred in this filing. /s/ Rachael Clarke Rachael Clarke Case 5:08-cv-03658-RS Document 21 Filed 03/16/2009 Page 4 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 16, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e-mail addresses denoted on the attached Electronic Mail Notice List, and I hereby certify that I have mailed the foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non-CM/ECF participants indicated on the attached Manual Notice List. I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed March 16, 2009. By: /s/ Rachael Clarke Rachael Clarke Morrison & Foerster LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415/268-7000 Fax: 415/268-7522 STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C-08-03658 4 Case 5:08-cv-03658-RS Document 21 Filed 03/16/2009 Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Mailing Information for a Case 5:08-cv-03658-RS Electronic Mail Notice List The following are those who are currently on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case. · Rachael Clarke rclarke@mofo.com,nurbina@mofo.com Joel E Elkins jelkins@weisslurie.com Jordan Eth jeth@mofo.com Jordan L. Lurie jlurie@weisslurie.com Leigh Anne Parker lparker@wllawca.com,lparker@weisslurie.com Anna Erickson White awhite@mofo.com,avickery@mofo.com Zev Benjamin Zysman zzysman@weisslurie.com,info@weisslurie.com · · · · · · Manual Notice List The following is the list of attorneys who are not on the list to receive e-mail notices for this case (who therefore require manual noticing). You may wish to use your mouse to select and copy this list into your word processing program in order to create notices or labels for these recipients. · (No manual recipients) STIP. AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. C-08-03658 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?