Sencham v. Dish Dash LLC et al

Filing 7

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference continued to 12/12/2008 02:30 PM. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/4/08. (rssec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2008)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RAFAEL SENCHAM, Plaintiff, v. DISH DASH, LLC, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ Pursuant to this Court's order dated November 20, 2008, all parties were ordered to make a determination regarding the issue of consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge and file the appropriate form no later than December 3, 2008. The parties were further ordered to file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement on or before December 3, 2008. No joint statement was timely filed. All parties shall make a determination regarding the issue of consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge and file the appropriate form no later than December 8, 2008. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement on or before December 8, 2008. The case management conference set for December 10, 2008 at 2:30 p.m. is continued to December 12, 2008 at 2:30 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 12/4/08 RICHARD SEEBORG United States Magistrate Judge No. C 08-03722 RS ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA *E-FILED 12/4/08* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT NOTICE OF THIS ORDER WAS ELECTRONICALLY PROVIDED TO: James Dal Bon jdblaw@earthlink.net shamiyeh@pacbell.net A. Nick Shamiyeh Dated: 12/4/08 /s/ BAK Chambers of Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?