Rojas v. Hawgs Seafood Bar, Inc. et al
Filing
74
ORDER GRANTING 73 Motion to Amend/Correct. (Attachments: Signed Application and Order for Appearance and Examination (3))Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/6/2012.(hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2012)
1
** E-filed January 6, 2012 **
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
For the Northern District of California
NOT FOR CITATION
8
United States District Court
7
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
ANWAR PEREZ ROJAS,
No. C08-03819 JF (HRL)
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO AMEND
[Re: Docket No. 73]
v.
13
HAWGS SEAFOOD BAR, INC.; et al.,
14
15
16
Defendants.
____________________________________/
On December 15, 2011, this court granted plaintiff’s motion for a judgment debtor exam of
17
three individuals. Dkt. No. 72. The plaintiff did not provide a proposed order, so the court drafted
18
one. Good cause now appearing, the court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion to amend that order to clarify
19
between the one individual who is a judgment debtor, Steven Hardin, and the two who are third
20
parties, Sara Hardin and Matthew Hardin, using the California Judicial Council forms provided by
21
plaintiff.
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 6, 2012
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
1
C08-03819 Notice will be electronically mailed to:
2
Adam Wang
3
Notice will be provided by mail to:
4
Steven Hardin
Hawgs Seafood Bar, Inc.
1700 West Campbell Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
5
adamqwang@gmail.com
6
7
Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not
registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program.
8
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?