Rojas v. Hawgs Seafood Bar, Inc. et al

Filing 74

ORDER GRANTING 73 Motion to Amend/Correct. (Attachments: Signed Application and Order for Appearance and Examination (3))Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/6/2012.(hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 ** E-filed January 6, 2012 ** 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 For the Northern District of California NOT FOR CITATION 8 United States District Court 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 ANWAR PEREZ ROJAS, No. C08-03819 JF (HRL) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND [Re: Docket No. 73] v. 13 HAWGS SEAFOOD BAR, INC.; et al., 14 15 16 Defendants. ____________________________________/ On December 15, 2011, this court granted plaintiff’s motion for a judgment debtor exam of 17 three individuals. Dkt. No. 72. The plaintiff did not provide a proposed order, so the court drafted 18 one. Good cause now appearing, the court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion to amend that order to clarify 19 between the one individual who is a judgment debtor, Steven Hardin, and the two who are third 20 parties, Sara Hardin and Matthew Hardin, using the California Judicial Council forms provided by 21 plaintiff. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 6, 2012 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 1 C08-03819 Notice will be electronically mailed to: 2 Adam Wang 3 Notice will be provided by mail to: 4 Steven Hardin Hawgs Seafood Bar, Inc. 1700 West Campbell Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 5 adamqwang@gmail.com 6 7 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?