Pulaski & Middleman, LLC v. Google Inc.

Filing 6

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pulaski & Middleman, LLC. Google Inc. served on 8/14/2008, answer due 9/3/2008. (Saveri, Guido) (Filed on 8/25/2008)

Download PDF
Pulaski & Middleman, LLC v. Google Inc. Doc. 6 \ /.**F FIRST LEGAL SUPPORT SERVIGES -<' lsll BEVERLY {\ BOULEVARD 15757.154877 LOS ANGELES GA 90026 (2131 25,0-1 11 1, FAX: (2131 25,0-1 157 Assigned To: NANCY GRADDY of Service: Normal ial: No Client : 1: 2" Plaintiff Defendant Representing: Court: SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. IR. ALEXANDER SAVERI 111 PINE STREET SUIrE 1700 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 lD:SAVSA-SF Phone: 415-217-6810 Hearing Date: GOOGLE INC. Case Number: CV 08 3888 SC Plaintiff DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES Last Dav to Sub: Last Day to Serve: Status: 08/19/08 ffi Descriotion: Race: Business. lNC., a Delaware corporation(155163) . Sex: . , Hair: , Eves: , Height: , Weight:- Aoe: Addresses: 08/1 5/08 2730 GATEWAY OAKS DRVE SUITE lOO SACRAMENTO. CA 95833 Documents: See 2nd Paqe for Documents to be Served Manner:_ Date Served By: Time Served:(Military) Served: I I Served At:_ [H]ome, [B]usiness, or [U]sual Place of Mailing tXI For Changes Above in Address Boxs Witness Fees: $(3.b.)Person Served Race:-, Sex:-, Age:-, Hair:-, Eyes:-, Height:-, Weight:Relationship Mailed + tPl IQI by Postng and Mailing via [R] Returned Not Served Cert [S] Substituted Service [T] Posting CCP 704.770 [U] Posted At Residence ffi Certified Mail CCP 415.45 [Z] First Class Mail CCP 415. (3.b.)By Leaving Gopies Wth Mailed From Date-Time 156757.154877 1511 BEVERLY BOULEVARD<>LOS ANGELES CA 90026<>Phone: (213) 250-1111, FAX: (213) 250-1197<> Dockets.Justia.com Attorney or Party without Attorney: For Court Use Only R. ALEXANDER SAVERI SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. PINE STREET lIl SUITE ITOO SANFRANCISCO, TeLephone No: CA 941II orFiteNo.: 415-217 -6810 Attorney for: Plaintiff l^"r*" Insert name ofCourt, and Judicial District and Branch Court: United States District Court Northern District Of California ptaintifr PULASKI & MIDDLEMAN, LLC, ect. Defendant: GOOGLE INC. learing Date: 18 years of age and not a Time: Dept/Div: Case Number: t, PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS IN A CTVIL At the time of service I was at least cv08 party to this action. 3888 SC I served copies of the SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION; CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT; CIVIL COVER SIIEET; ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADRDEADLINES; ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; CONTENTS OF JOINT CASEMANAGEMENT STATEMENT; NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO (ERCISE JURISDICTION; NOTICE OF LAWSUT AND REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS; WAIVER OF SERVICE OF ST]MMONS; ECF REGISTRATION INFORMATION HANDOUTI WELCOME TO Tm U.S. DISTRICT COURT; DROP BOX FILING PROCEDURES. 3. a. Party served: b. Person served: 1. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation BECKY DEGEORGE, AUTHORZED AGENT FOR SERVICE Address where the prlt was served: 2730 GATEWAY OAKS DRIVE SUITE lOO SACRAMENTO. CA 95833 5. I served the party: a. by personal service. I personally delivered the documents listed in item on: Fri., Aug. 15, 2008 (2) at: 9:304M The "Notice to the Person Served" (on the Summons) was completed on behalf of GOOGLE INC. Under CCP 416.10 (corporation) Person Who Served Papers: process for the party 2 to the party or person authorized to receive service of (l) as follows: Recoverable Cost Per CCP 1033.5(a)(a)@) a.NANCY GRADDY First SEPVft;g d. The Feefor Service was: e. I am: (3) registered California process server ( "I' ^,.TARtl:Y Independent Contractor 1814 (ii) (iii) Registration STRET No.: 04-010 Placer Socronenlo, C^ 95814 (e1) 4,r.r-s111. FX 4l.t-3117 County: 8. I declre under penlfy of perjury under the lws of the Stfe of Califurni nd under the Inws of the Unted Stafes.Of America th theforegoing is true nd correct. Date:Fri, Aug. 15, 2008 Judicial Council Form POS-010 Rule 2.150.(a)&(b) Rev January 1,2007 SUMMONS IN A CIVIL PROOFOFSERVICE I 0.savsa-sf,, I 54877

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?