Pulaski & Middleman, LLC v. Google Inc.
Filing
6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pulaski & Middleman, LLC. Google Inc. served on 8/14/2008, answer due 9/3/2008. (Saveri, Guido) (Filed on 8/25/2008)
Pulaski & Middleman, LLC v. Google Inc.
Doc. 6
\ /.**ìF FIRST LEGAL SUPPORT SERVIGES
-<' lsll
BEVERLY
{\
BOULEVARD
15Ê757.154877
LOS ANGELES GA 90026 (2131 25,0-1 11 1, FAX: (2131 25,0-1 157
Assigned To: NANCY GRADDY
of Service:
Normal
ial: No
Client
: 1: 2"
Plaintiff Defendant
Representing: Court:
SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. IR. ALEXANDER SAVERI 111 PINE STREET SUIrE 1700 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
lD:SAVSA-SF
Phone:
415-217-6810
Hearing Date:
GOOGLE INC. Case Number: CV 08 3888 SC Plaintiff DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES Last Dav to Sub: Last Day to Serve: Status: 08/19/08
ffi
Descriotion: Race:
Business.
lNC., a Delaware corporation(155163) . Sex: . , Hair: , Eves: , Height: , Weight:-
Aoe:
Addresses:
08/1 5/08
2730 GATEWAY OAKS DR¡VE SUITE lOO SACRAMENTO. CA 95833
Documents:
See 2nd Paqe for Documents to be Served
Manner:_ Date
Served By: Time Served:(Military) Served: I I Served At:_ [H]ome, [B]usiness, or [U]sual Place of Mailing tXI For Changes Above in Address Boxs Witness Fees: $(3.b.)Person Served Race:-, Sex:-, Age:-, Hair:-, Eyes:-, Height:-, Weight:Relationship
Mailed
+
tPl IQI by Post¡ng and Mailing via [R] Returned Not Served
Cert
[S] Substituted Service [T] Posting CCP 704.770 [U] Posted At Residence
ffi
Certified Mail CCP 415.45 [Z] First Class Mail CCP 415.Æ
(3.b.)By Leaving Gopies W¡th
Mailed
From
Date-Time
156757.154877
1511 BEVERLY BOULEVARD<>LOS
ANGELES CA 90026<>Phone: (213) 250-1111, FAX: (213) 250-1197<>
Dockets.Justia.com
Attorney or Party without Attorney:
For Court Use Only
R. ALEXANDER SAVERI SAVERI & SAVERI, INC. PINE STREET
lIl
SUITE ITOO SANFRANCISCO,
TeLephone No:
CA 941II
orFiteNo.:
415-217 -6810
Attorney
for: Plaintiff
l^"r*"
Insert name ofCourt, and Judicial District and Branch Court:
United States District Court Northern District Of California ptaintifr PULASKI & MIDDLEMAN, LLC, ect.
Defendant:
GOOGLE INC.
learing Date:
18 years of age and not a
Time: Dept/Div:
Case Number:
t,
PROOF OF SERVICE SUMMONS IN A CTVIL At the time of service I was at least
cv08
party to this action.
3888 SC
I served copies of the SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION; CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT; CIVIL COVER SIIEET; ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADRDEADLINES; ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; CONTENTS OF JOINT CASEMANAGEMENT STATEMENT; NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE TO Ð(ERCISE JURISDICTION; NOTICE OF LAWSUT AND REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS; WAIVER OF SERVICE OF ST]MMONS; ECF REGISTRATION INFORMATION HANDOUTI WELCOME TO Tm U.S. DISTRICT COURT; DROP BOX FILING PROCEDURES.
3. a. Party served:
b. Person served:
1.
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation BECKY DEGEORGE, AUTHORZED AGENT FOR SERVICE
Address where the
pørlt was served:
2730 GATEWAY OAKS DRIVE
SUITE lOO SACRAMENTO. CA 95833
5.
I served the party: a. by personal service. I personally delivered the documents listed in item
on: Fri., Aug. 15, 2008 (2) at: 9:304M The "Notice to the Person Served" (on the Summons) was completed on behalf of GOOGLE INC. Under CCP 416.10 (corporation) Person Who Served Papers:
process for the party
2 to the party or person authorized to receive service
of
(l)
as
follows:
Recoverable Cost Per CCP 1033.5(a)(a)@)
a.NANCY GRADDY
First
SEPVft;üg
d. The Feefor Service was:
e.
I am: (3) registered California process server
(Ð
"I'
^,.ÍTARtlì:Y
Independent Contractor
1814
(ii)
(iii)
Registration
STREÊT
No.:
04-010
Placer
Socronenlo, C^ 95814 (e1ó) 4,r.r-s111. FÁX 4l.t-3117
County:
8. I
decløre under penølfy of perjury under the løws of the Støfe of Califurniø ønd under the Inws of the Uníted Stafes.Of America thú theforegoing is true ønd correct.
Date:Fri, Aug. 15, 2008
Judicial Council Form POS-010 Rule 2.150.(a)&(b) Rev January 1,2007 SUMMONS IN A CIVIL
PROOFOFSERVICE
I 0.savsa-sf,, I 54877
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?